A Permanent Shadow Cast Upon Obama’s Presidency
Article Tools
-
2
Liked it 
Subscribe to RSS
Story concerns US Supreme Court Justice John Roberts and legal briefs questioning Obama’s eligibility to be President.
What is strangely going on? Is it preparatory to a (supposed) coup d’état? In surely one of the most constitutionally and politically astounding, incredible, and shocking events to have ever occurred, in all of recorded American history, US Supreme Court Justice John Roberts had publicly stated that he would actually read legal briefs pertaining to the questioning of Barak Hussein Obama‘s actual qualifications to be President of the United States of America. Superlatives, meaning trying to use words alone, do not do enough genuine justice to what this importantly means, at a minimum.
What is even more extremely incredible, however, is that this and many related developments, such as, e.g., US Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia’s commitment to agree to hear such a case, if three other justices also agree, are not headline news announcements in the mass media. The truly massive and continuing silence, therefore, is proverbially deafening. It is scary. One hopes that there is no truth to this case, for the sake of the survival of the American republic, though strange things have, in fact, happened in this country’s history.
The shattering implications are enormously pregnant with forceful matters of a gigantic magnitude not seen since the Watergate Era, much less the Bill Clinton impeachments. By taking this significantly important matter to the highest Federal level of the nation’s judiciary, therefore, history is then being made, even if nothing at all comes of this attempt to disqualify a sitting president of his full right to properly be the Commander-in-Chief, the nation’s Chief Executive.
Readers can get further details by consulting World Net Daily and other sources as to the circumstances and efforts involved, including the cognate cases, names of people, and variously related legal activities concerning the matter. The present and restricted purpose of this present article is to just further alert people concerning what is going on regarding efforts to seek to find out if Obama is truly legally the President or not.
The US Constitution is, of course, completely clear, without any doubt, as to the basic and necessary considerations of eligibility that must, under all circumstance, be legally met by any prospective candidate for this office, as is formally stated in Article II, Section I of the document that exists as the fundamental law of the land for America.
How could such a situation come to exist? Are there truly millions of Americans who seriously question Obama’s eligibility? There currently exists an online petition, signed, so far, by over 350,000 Americans, representing, one logically assumes, at least some millions of others in terms of family members, etc. who are demanding publicly that the man who now hold the Office of President fully disclose his actual birth papers or produce a truly legal certificate of birth proving undoubted, native-born status as an American citizen.
Until such presented physical and legal proof can be really produced, therefore, millions, perhaps, many millions of people in this country will not ever be willing to believe that he is not, in fact, an unconstitutional usurper having no proper and legal business posing as an assumed president.
Merely the giving of such necessarily astounding legal briefs to the Chief Justice of the US Supreme Court ought, at a bare minimum, to certainly inspire some logical degree of appropriate concern that there is, in fact, absolutely and positively no proof whatsoever that Obama could possibly be ineligible to be the Chief Executive. This is, one must agree, politically dangerous stuff; it is dynamite that can be exploded— if there might ever realistically arise any reasonable and solid doubt, to any major degree, that Obama is a political and legal fraud. The nation, therefore, awaits the final outcome of Justice Roberts’ reading of the documents.
If anything should actually prove to legally actionable before the US Supreme Court, the American people will necessarily end up living in truly perilous times, much greater than having to exist during a great economic depression. The dangers involved are clear by the fact that Justice Roberts thinks that the matter is grave enough, serious enough, to formally merit his personal attention to considering legal briefs questioning the legality of the person currently holding the Office of President of the most powerful nation on earth, the greatest military power in the recorded history of the world.
These above considerations are not of a minor nature. One is talking about actions that could develop into tremendous and terrifying matters pertaining to the disposition of President Obama or, ought one to say, a “President” Obama? Future developments may very well be earth shaking. The assuredly great importance of what has already happened, legally occurred, ought not to be simply dismissed or just waved off without much needed comment or genuine concern. In any event, because of what has publicly happened, a permanent shadow has been now cast upon the entire presidency of Barack Hussein Obama.
Of course, readers are always left free to make their own independent decisions, as to what they think might happen, which must, realistically, include the typical contention that nothing much will ever develop. On the other hand, admittedly, the grave and shocking potential for what might occur is truly frightening in its certainly enormous implications and extensive extrapolations, both domestically and internationally considered as such.
7 Comments
Let me get this straight…
These people think that Barack Obama went to elementary school, middle school, high school, Occidental College, Columbia University, Harvard Law school, that he got married, ran for the Senate and then the Presidency against Hillary Clinton and John McCain (who both looked for any way to get him out of the race).
The Supreme Court (the same conservative one that gave us Bush v. Gore) has rejected the issue 4 times, federal courts have done the same-
There is no documentation that his mother ever went to Kenya (she would have to go there to give birth to him, right?)Not only that, both of Hawaii’s major newspapers carried announcements of Obama’s birth in 1961. So, the Supreme Court, Hawaiian Records Officials,the Hawaiian State Board of Education, two Ivy League colleges, the Clinton Campaign, the McCain campaign, customs and both of those papers would have to be in on the conspiracy since the day that Barack Obama was born.
This is a massive, forty year, bi-partisan conspiracy to make Barack Hussein Obama Jr president of the United States illegally? To what end?
I got a better idea: Obama is really a little green man from Neptune.
Barrack Obama is a natural born citizen even if only by the virtue that his mother was. That’s what the Constitution considers a citizen (if your parents were) and their is no federal law defining “natural born citizen” or distinguishing it from just plain citizen.
You know that’s true. People like you are just keeping this story alive for attention and to distract from the things that actually affect normal Americans. And what’s worse, you’re (perhaps deliberately) playing off the basest fears of xenophobic conservatives.
The fact you’re claiming this is a such a hugely important event says a lot about your perspective on politics. Maybe you should devote your passion to something that actually matters, like the issues.
Has Mr. Obama ever produced a birth certificate? Newspaper announcements are not the same thing. I can have any paper anywhere announce my birth and it is regular practice to do so in places you once inhabited. I do not think that it is fair to call people xenophobic because they want to see the U.S. Constitution followed. These types of rumors will persist throughout the Obama reign, because most major media outlets have refused to vet him. Conservatives have lost faith in such outlets. The best thing that could happen for Obama would be a judicial confirmation of his legal citizenship, especially by a conservative court.
You know what, a simple DNA test linking him to his mother would suffice, for reason’s I’ve previously stated. And a birth certificate has been produced, but conspiracy theorists like you decided it wasn’t good enough.
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2008/06/obama-birth.html
I don’t know what your problem is. Any mature person should be able to move on and criticize him for something constructive. Do you think it’s easy to respect you when your argument sounds like something a 4th grader would say because they lost the game?
You are welcome to your opinion. Unlike you, I will not question or disrespect your motives. I am not a constitutional scholar.
However, constitutional scholars have raised questions. Also, legal briefs have, in fact, been presented to the US Supreme, as you ought to know since you are so informed.
If Obama is really not hiding anything, he has absolutely nothing to fear. Those raising any legitimate objections can be legally, constitutionally, factually disproved in their contentions. I will await the constitutional processes to see what happens. I am not afraid of the truth.
If he is not eligible for his office (that’s “if”), he is a usurper, which some people, at least, do think is an extremely important issue as regards the US Constitution and maintaining liberty under law for the survival of republican government.
When elements of the American Left, in the 1960s, had claimed that Nixon had really been born in Mexico, no one was improperly supposed to ever dare question the always manifest honesty, integrity, sincerity, character, etc. of those nut cases; but, everyone today is to endlessly suspect and forever denounce literally anyone who questions whether or not Obama was legally, constitutionally, qualified to become President.
Where’s the supposed fairness or assumed objectivity in all that? It all depends on whose ox is being gored. Either a single standard of right v. wrong ought to exist or not. Otherwise, there is no objective reasoning involved, only passions, feelings, not facts.
As with the many different court opinions on this matter, what is not said is still highly significant. While the purported certificate on file is said to be “in accordance with state policies and procedures,” there’s no actual or formal affirmation that the document in question truly reflects an actual Hawaiian birth.
In addition, it is highly noteworthy that there is not any cited explanation for the noted particular image of the Hawaii state “certification of live birth” that has, in point of fact,been posted by Obama, which is alleged, on the Internet, to be the document of his Hawaiian birth; however,this is even though Hawaiian procedures, at the time, legally allowed that document to be issued to parents of children not born in the state itself.
An important and forever critical question that, thus, troubles people can be simply put as follows: “Why would an individual with a supposedly verified and fully valid birth certificate also have a “certification of live birth?”
This very enormous and troubling paradox ought, therefore, to be legally and constitutionally resolved before Obama could ever be said to be legitimately the President of the USA.