Obama as a Neo-Syndicalist Despot

For those who may have been keenly wondering exactly which path toward further collectivization, in its specifics, would be chosen by Obama, the situation regarding, e. g., the bold government takeover of Chrysler appears to be basically indicative; the auto union got 55% of the predominantly effective ownership while, in effect, the government via Obama (AKA Fearless Leader, Great One, Anointed One, El Supremo), as a mostly new-fangled Juan Peron, got control of the rest.  

After all, in this country, it is known that 35% of all union memberships are government employees and that percentage can only grow, moreover, more rapidly, vigorously, as the public sector expands greatly; consequently, the private or free sector of the economy is, therefore, scheduled to necessarily shrink as the State gains more and more of the national GDP, which stands at 40% currently; it has been projected to easily be 65%, in another year or two, as massive government spending and debt creation, meaning interventionism or statism, accelerates quite dramatically.

Of course, the preceding failures of the Bush Administration are situationally and gratuitously blamed for creating this basic situation (which is only partly true), though the (now obviously failed) bailouts were once supposed to entirely preclude such economic failure, by these car corporations; so, General Motors, according to the exposed ideological logic, appears to be, more or less, next in line for neo-syndicalist conversion, as has, in fact, politically and economically occurred to Chrysler.

The aforementioned political actions were not at all consistent, of course, with classical or traditional understandings of the laborite ideology of syndicalism because, among other reasons as to syndicalist theoretics, the unions of this country will not, as yet, be simply equivalent to the government itself; rather, through a creative neo-syndicalism (a means toward the intended end), a symbiotic-political partnership will be then dynamically established between those unions friendly to the State; this is, logically, so that together they will cooperatively determine the true nature of the growing features of the later full-scale, social-market economy/socialist democracy to come for this nation.  

Very few Americans, however, unless they are fairly familiar with such realities, as have and do exist in Latin America under various dictatorial/authoritarian regimes, would be able to immediately recognize what has and will further happen to politically transform the USA, as is urgently desired, ideologically speaking, by Obama and his (informed) supporters.

The US Constitution, of course, has no such radical provisions for these extreme kinds of politico-economic actions, as directed and controlled by the nation’s Chief Executive, who has and will, increasingly, exercise an ever-widening variety of extra-constitutional powers once thought yet unimaginable in this country.   FDR, in contrast, will just calmly appear to have been an extreme “conservative” versus the aggressive actions that will be taken by the nation’s quite audacious Fearless Leader.

Eventually, there cannot be any true limits placed upon whatever the Anointed One adamantly decides to do, always for the supposed good of this country; El Supremo’s wondrous word alone will, over the course of time and much accepted practice, become, de facto, the law.  And, the habit of obedience is to be crescively inculcated in the (oppressed) population in the revered name of seeking the nirvana of full economic recovery, which never is to come; after all, true collectivization does not want to bring about any actual prosperity because it can, e. g., raise uncontrollable expectations, among the populace, to try to exercise unwanted, meaning by the State, economic liberty.

Obama knows this reality of politics; he realizes how dangerous free-market economic activity is to the exercise of tyrannical powers in a country where people once knew what economic liberty had been like in terms of a rising standard of living, hopes that one’s children and grandchildren would live better, etc. 

The thrust of neo-syndicalism, with the expected and added propaganda supplied by the drive-by media, will pervert and divert any attempts to raise expectations; the people need to be kept as reasonably docile as possible lest they get any anti-syndicalist thoughts about being, once again, a (relatively) free people under God.   But, the Great One has solid plans as to what is needed to be done for successfully achieving his rise toward the definitely Leftist goal of enforcing a democratic despotism.

His radical-Leftist appointments to the US Supreme Court can, furthermore, be rationally expected, as was almost totally true for FDR’s later years, to happily support the Great One’s expansive ambitions for rulership, along with a mainly compliant, Democratic Party-controlled Congress to add the convenient facade of legality. 

And, the American version of the Peronistas, among the drive-by media, intellectuals, academics, bureaucrats, and elites, will willingly and lovingly cheer on their Great One to more and more victories over the assumed exploiters and their ilk.   Opposition to this unconstitutional transition to a neo-syndicalist version of a transformational social democracy in America, supported largely by a democratic despotism, will, thus, prove mostly feeble at best.

The interesting and well-founded prediction, made by Alexander Hamilton and others, that a radicalizing excess of extremes of attempted democratization-gone-mad can, thus, only eventually produce an unmitigated form of tyranny will be firmly proven true at last, courtesy of Obama and the progressive-minded Obamanites.  The neo-syndicalism to be instituted will, therefore, prove effective enough regarding how the social-market economy can displace most or, eventually, almost all of what had been parts of a lively private sector. 

This is, moreover, empirically to be well observed, for instance, in Italy that economically functions mainly because of its vibrant and much needed black-market economy, certainly not because of its social democracy that, thus, exists as a fundamental failure.  America, once generally perceived as an unrivaled economic giant, can, therefore, see its likely future in Italy.