Obama’s Bow Not Returned: Etiquette of Bowing in Japan
Article Tools
-
0
Liked it
Subscribe to RSS
Obama is criticized for bowing to foreign leaders, the way of greeting rarely practised by former US presidents. Does the bow show decorum or diplomacy? Why wasn’t the bow returned?
Image via Wikipedia
The surprise and furore created by Obama’s bowing to the Saudi Arabian King Abdullah is yet to die down. Obama bows low to Emperor Akihito. Though the world has better things to worry about, it does stare nonplussed, that, when the leaders greeted with bows are not averse to or ignorant of the handshake, why were they so greeted.
There are other things that puzzle. The angle of the bow is important in a Japanese bow. Greater angle denotes profound respect.
We do not know the angle of Obama’s bow, but his bow was not returned by the Emperor. Was he too surprised to react or has he considered himself superior, being a monarch? Do the monarchs of other countries return the bows given by heads of countries?
Did Obama greet this way because “in Japan he wanted to do as the Japanese do?”
The Japanese etiquette of bowing is valued and practised inside the country and the people of Japan do not expect foreigners to practice this.
Yet the foreigners think that not bowing may offend the Japanese, and learn bowing before they meet the Japanese or visit Japan. The Japanese bowing is done with straight backs and hands at the sides for men. Women clasped their hands and bow. They bow with eyes down and a deeper bow indicates more respect.
Members of the family, younger, are bowed, bent at an angle of ten to fifteen degrees. Close friends are also greeted this way.
Greeting higher ups and elders is done by bending about thirty degrees. The duration of the bow is also considered important by the people of Japan. Longer duration indicates more respect. Bows of longer duration (more than three seconds) have to be responded by bowing again lightly. A bow of over forty five degrees and more than time duration of four seconds is asking forgiveness. The higher ups acknowledge the bow by a nod or a tilt of the head.
People of other countries, in their agitation not to offend, mix up the hand shake and bow and do both. This can be done by turning the head sideways so as not to bump heads.
May be the Emperor did not want this unpleasant thing to happen and so did not bow.












12 Comments
All U.S presidents’ staff in advance of foreign visits determine and pass along to the president current protocol. Perhaps this was lacking in this case. Perhaps the emperor was making a statement.
Interesting article!
very interesting article..thanks for posting..
I have no idea but I think President Obama did the polite thing. After all when in Rome do as the Romans.
I know nothing about the protocol for bowing, but I personally when in Rome do as the Romans do. I would like to courtesy before the Queen of England if I had that honor. Of course I am a citizen and not the president of a country. Why should presidents be different? I think this is such a big deal over something that should not be an issue. You posted this well.
The Emperor of Japan does not have to bow to anyone. It’s protocol. And according to protocol an emperor out ranks a president so Obama bowed to him. If an emperor wants to be polite he may bow slightly. When a president does not give at least a slight bow he is sending a message that he does not feel an emperor is of a greater rank, he is also showing distain for protocol and many in Japan may consider him ignorant.
He should have gone prepared with all this or only a gesture of a bow should do.Liked your interpretation.
Very interesting article.
I bow to this article. An interesting piece and indeed President Obama did change US history with a bow. At least for once, US must learn humility if she lacks it.
Obama will change the US history…
Perhaps there is a statement being made by the Japanese Emperor, or just an over site, we have never had a US President in our history bow down to any other World Leader.
They did say this President would change history, and that is just what he is doing. Just as this can turn into a political discussion, which is our right “Freedom of Speech”.
Politics can become a heated debated leaving behind bad blood. You have some great points to be considered.
Great article
Very educational write up with a taste of current events. well done.