Open Season: The Conservative Assault on California’s Poor
Article Tools
-
0
Liked it
Subscribe to RSS
Derek Hart voices his frustration not only at the proposed cuts to health, welfare, and education in his native California, but also at how – in his view – conservatives are uncaring and heartless when it comes to those in poverty and the less fortunate.
Recently the Los Angeles Times reported that in order to combat a $24 billion gap in the state budget, California’s governor Arnold Schwartzenegger proposed to eliminate the following:
- The Cal Works program, which providegers financial help for over 500,000 low income families,
- Healthy Families, which is the provides medical coverage to nearly a million young people, and…
- Cal Grants, which provides funds for low income students to attend college who would otherwise not be able to go.
These cuts would virtually kill the safety net that California’s poor so desperately needs, especially in these times, as well as leave millions of people without health care, funds for college, and money for essentials such as food and rent.
Since Schwartzenegger is a Republican and a conservative, I was not that surprised about him wanting to make cuts, particularly in light of this mini-economic depression, which is what this crisis is.
Though I have always felt this way, what the dear Terminator wants to do has convinced me more than ever that…
- Conservatives do not care about poor people.
- Conservatives do not care about the underprivileged, particularly the young.
- Conservatives do not care about the health of poor people and poor children.
- Conservatives do not care about the education of poor people.
Why else have conservative Republicans, whenever they have been in power, have enacted policies that have robbed the less fortunate of jobs, medical care, and housing, oftentimes throwing them out into the street.
It is clear to me that there has never been a more heartless population of people during the past fifty years than conservative Americans.
These are the people that tell you to “pull yourself up by your own bootstraps”. But what if you can’t afford any boots, as is the case with millions of people in this country.
These are the people that would rather have a jobless, homeless, and hungry person – who is often unable to obtain employment due to things like mental illness or disability, and who has no family – fall through the cracks and rot.
These are the people who, if they were with Jesus 2,000 years ago when those 5,000 followers needed food, would have told him to let them starve while they divided the five loaves of bread and two fishes among themselves.
And these are the people who, if someone had hit on misfortune and was unable to pay the rent or mortgage, would throw them out onto the street without any feelings or remorse. If children were involved, they’d be thrown out, too – who cares if a five-year-old has to sleep on a park bench?
Yep, conservatives are cold, unfeeling, uncaring, and heartless toward their fellow man, particularly if such fellow man is down on his luck. Just like the school yard bully who takes lunch money from little kids and laughs at their tears.
I personally noticed this heartlessness when I was a teenager in the 1980s.
In Santa Monica, CA, where I grew up, I noticed during that decade a considerable rise in homelessness, of more and more people with medical conditions and mental illness, or who had lost a job, sleeping on the streets and in the parks; Palisades Park, a famous recreation area located on the bluffs overlooking the beach and the Pacific Ocean, became a neighborhood of transients during that time, with tents and shopping carts popping up all over the place.
All of this happened during the years after Ronald Reagan was elected president. Coincidence? I think not. Reagan cut off funding for the state mental hospitals during that time, throwing those poor souls, whom everyone knew couldn’t take care of themselves, out on the street.
Talk about heartless and uncaring, eh?
But back to Schwartzenegger – he has certainly shown his true colors by proposing these cuts. He has shown that he wants to throw families onto the streets, deny children healthcare, and deny young people access to a college education, which is exactly what will happen should these cuts come to fruition.
I know full well that GOP conservatives will be incensed upon reading this. They will call me a naive Communist, a Socialist, politically correct pinko who does not understand what makes America great.
They will call me a lazy slacker who doesn’t want to work and sacrifice and who only wants a free ride, who wants to tax the heart and soul out of hard working people.
And you know what? That’s OK.
I am a guy who wants to see people who cannot take care of themselves (and believe me, there are plenty of those out there) be taken care of in this country. Who wants all those less fortunate souls who need help to be able to get that help freely, quickly, and easily. And who wants to see poverty eradicated by any means necessary, unlike conservatives who only care about the rich getting richer and the poor getting poorer.
If that makes me a Socialist, then I wholeheartedly plead guilty.
I once read somewhere that one can truly judge a society by how they take care of its poor.
If that is the case, then the United States gets a big, fat “F-minus” grade in that aspect. Because no other developed country has treated its poor worse than America has.
I freely admit that I don’t have all the answers as to how to deal with this economic crisis in my home state of California.
But I do know that what our governor is proposing will solve nothing and will cause nothing but suffering and desperate hardship to those who can afford it the least.
And that makes me angry and sad.
My only hope is that the senators and state assembly in Sacramento will fight and do what ever they need to do to prevent these cuts in education, health, and welfare from happening. Surely this crisis can be dealt with without putting the burden on the poor and underprivileged. They have certainly suffered enough.
No one wants to see California – and the rest of the U.S. – recover from this mini-depression more than me, but these cuts are NOT the way to go about it.
That’s all I am trying to say.











6 Comments
I AM WITH YOU ALL THE WAY!!!! It really has gotten that bad. I love the way you explained how the rich would have divided the bread and fish among themselves, and told Jesus to let the poor starve. That is exactly how I see it too.
Our leaders were building prisons like wild fire at the same time they were plotting to cut welfare. They knew that desperate people would do desperate crimes to survive, and they were getting ready for them. We have the largest prison population in the world, with the longest sentences, and for the most petty of crimes committed. The bottom line is the MONEY. Prisons are the largest PROFIT MAKING industry in this country, and our leaders are laughing all the way to the bank, while the poor are railroaded into prisons like concentration camps.
There is a secret plot to commit “genocide of the Poor” in this country. It is right under the noses of the people, and they still can’t see it.
There were Jewish people who had tried to warn the Jewish communities of the up coming Holocaust, and it was to UNBELIEVABLE to believe. So they did nothing, AND THEN IT HAPPENED.! Wake up People! First your home is foreclosed, then you lose your job, and YOU ARE NEXT to reap the evil of the leaders you trust.
Come on man! Jesus said “the poor will always be with you”. That doesn’t mean we shouldn’t do all we can to help them. But to make it so we gives people incentives to “stay poor” is ridiculous. Here in Florida we have Section 8 (free housing), SSI (welfare), Metropoitan Ministries (free food) and other sources of indigent help. I don’t think any society will ever come up with all the answers to cure poverty, so we have to stick with something that at least helps the masses in large percentage. It’s just never going to be perfect, and we have to accept that. Our hearts can’t be hardened to them so we must give as much as we can. I think in general, America is a very giving nation. California is a mess much as many states are because the politicians spend money they don’t have then they go looking for places to cut, and the poor are an easy target without much representaion. When the economy rises, all boats rise with the tide.
For jimazz:
First of all, where did I say in my piece that we ought to give people incentives to stay poor?
Second, Jesus also told a rich guy, when asked how could get eternal life, to go sell everything he had & give the $ to the poor. You name me one person who’s willing to do that today. He may have said that there will always be poor, but THAT DOES NOT MEAN THAT WE SHOULDN’T USE ANY MEANS NECESSARY TO END POVERTY.
Also, you said: “I don’t think any society will ever come up with all the answers to cure poverty…we have to accept that.” I’m sorry, but I don’t accept that! I will never, ever accept the fact that there are people who cannot help themselves that are getting their throats cut by uncaring conservatives.
And you also said, “When the economy rises, all boats rise with the tide.” Sorry, but I feel that’s BS. If that was the case, poverty & homeless wouldn’t exist.
We’ll end up agreeing to disagree, I’m sure – what I said in this article is how I feel, & I’m sticking to it.
Someday(probably not in the distant future) government social
sevices will be cut off, ended.
What will be the consequences? I think we all know the answer to that question.
Will the Christian church in that day respond as it should?
I doubt it!
No one will call it murder! No one will be blamed! Most of us will look the other way! Won’t we?!
Many poor people will die off.
Isn’t that the idea after all! Isn’t that the desired result!
before the republicans get all the blame maybe you should like at the liberals and democrats that control the assembly. the govener cant do anything with out there approval
Nobody is getting “robbed” of their healthcare. Think about it. You have a service that is expensive being paid for by others who pay tax to provide for those who don’t pay. Who is “robbing” who here?
Look, if a family can’t afford to live somewhere without the government assistance listed above, they should move. Plain and simple. California is one of the richest places on Earth. Fortune 500 companies litter the state. The agriculture is outstanding. The entertainment industry is top notch. The weather is perfect. The fact that it has such high taxes and still cannot balance the budget is nothing short of astounding.
So, in making a choice, with the realization that money is not limitless, who should get the money? The person who earned it, or the person who needs it. That is the fundamental question here. As a one time decision, I can see going with need. The problem about making it policy is that needs will always grow….because the neediest will be rewarded with cheaper/free assistance, food, health care, child care, housing, tuition. Seriously…what is left? Why work? It’s so much easier to need.
Tell you what. Let Arnold go crazy and cut ALL of the programs for 3 years while nobody gets the money except for the bondholders who CA is indebted to. See how the fundamentals change in the state. Then go back and decide how badly you want to bring these programs back.