The Curious Case of the Tea Party Protesters
Article Tools
-
32
Liked it
Subscribe to RSS
Let’s take a close look at the proclaimed targets of the protests, taxes and fascism.
Revolution!
Last week, scores of conservatives took to the streets and emptied their teabags in protest of two main perceived injustices: first, taxation without representation, hearkening back to the days when the Sons of Liberty stuck it to the British for taxes imposed without elected representation; and second, fascism, hearkening back to the days when … the Reichstag burned?
This movement, propelled by CNBC’s Rick Santelli’s February 2009 on-air rant about the Obama Administration’s stimulus bill, is intriguing, to say the least. In the interest of trying to understand what compelled tens of hundreds of citizens to do things like wear hats festooned with dangling tea-bags as testaments to their “burning desire to restore freedom,” I have decided to look a little more closely at their complaints and claims.
First, I find it particularly fascinating that the protesters seem to have missed the fact that their taxes are imposed by – you guessed it – their elected representatives. Perhaps the idea is that if their preferred representatives aren’t in charge, they aren’t truly being represented. In other words, the only way they can have true representation is if their leaders are in a permanent position of power, as in, oh, I don’t know, a fascist regime? But more on that later…
These tax day protests are also interesting in light of the recent spate of tax cuts passed by the Obama Administration. Perhaps some of the protestors are among the roughly 2% of the American population who earn hundreds of thousands of dollars a year—and thus will have their taxes returned to the level they were prior to the GW Bush era—but watching coverage of the gatherings, I get the feeling that not all these protestors are pulling in that kind of dough.
More disturbing than even the tea bag hats, however, is the charge of fascism, led by Fox News “reporter” Cody Willard. And with no apparent understanding of politics or history, a number of protesters carried signs depicting President Obama as Adolph Hitler. In order to unravel the links between President Obama and Herr Hitler, let’s get back to basics: what were the building blocks of fascism and Nazism?
Well, first there was hyper-nationalism. Patriotism (which is generally used by such regimes as a pretty word for nationalism) was exalted above all else, and those who questioned their leaders were seen as unpatriotic and suffered the consequences of such status. That sounds familiar, though it is reminiscent of a previous administration, and not the current one—I mean, I may be asleep at the wheel, but when did the Obama administration exalt love of the state above the individual? In fact, wasn’t the complaint earlier that he was insufficiently nationalistic? Now he’s overly so? Thinking back, though, I do recall a recent administration, in order to rally the country to war, questioning the patriotism of dissenters. Does anyone else remember that?
Next, as we all know, the best accessory for hyper-nationalism is militarism and a drive toward war, and the Nazi regime married these elements together deftly, even making war against countries that had not threatened them and carrying out unprovoked invasions of other sovereign countries.
Again, where have I heard of such things happening…?
Further, the short list of those persecuted by the Nazis includes Jews, Roma, homosexuals, and socialists. Since President Obama recently hosted a Passover Seder, reached out in friendship to the Muslim world, and hasn’t been cracking down on the gay community, I’m not getting the connection there, either. Perhaps the president is not only a radical black Christian and a secret Muslim—he’s a Jew in disguise, as well. What do you expect from an elitist, socialist terrorist?
And finally, who can forget the fact that fascism is characterized by leaders with unlimited control? Recently released Bush Administration memos expose the twisted legal reasoning used by the Administration to allow President Bush to violate any provision of the Constitution at any time. Rather than continue in this vein, the Obama Administration has exposed and condemned that type of unaccountable leadership. Further, unlike any fascist in history, President Obama has been working hard to repair foreign relations, even with those we perceive as potential enemies, and in doing so, he has been criticized for being too weak. A true fascist would be appalled by such peacemaking efforts.
And I won’t even get into the Nazi regime’s use of torture or its espionage against its own people, because I think you get my point.
Still, as liberals insisted during the Bush Administration, protest is patriotic. So here’s to the patriots, teabags in hand. At this rate you will ensure that in the America of the future, the Green Party will be the party of the left, the Democrats will be the party of the right, and the Republicans will have gone the way of the Whigs.











13 Comments
Please, please, please keep believing that this grassroots movement is nothing but a bunch of misguided ignorant racist Republicans expressing their anger at having lost the White House to an African.
Another article by a far-left -code pink type- whacko, communist.
Just what we need–why dont you people go live with your friends in
Iran and be happy the rest of your life.
Another piece of crap article.
Good Article. I would take the vitriolic criticism as a compliment. The truth hurts.
Hey Joe–
Where in this article does the author make the claim that the protesters are “a bunch of misguided ignorant racist Republicans expressing their anger at having lost the White House to an African.”?
I have read this piece again and again, and I cannot find this text anywhere… Funny thing about debate–it works best when you make arguments that are grounded in facts and reality.
Oh, and by the way, Barack Obama is an African-AMERICAN, not an African, and his mother was white, as were the grand-parents who raised him. I mean, you know that, right?
Oh, and as for you, Vickie, and even you, underperforming Andy–your debate skills could really use some polishing, as well! Or are you only comfortable making provocative statements with no basis in fact?
Honestly, this is worse than kids on a playground.
Here’s what *I* found compelling in this piece–how easy it is to find parallels between the Bush regime and fascism and how utterly revolting it is that pathetic twits like Cody Willard and Rick Santelli need only shout a few catch-phrases in order to work a whole bunch of misguided people into a frothy-mouthed, tea bag dumping frenzy.
Oh, and the commentaters here, thus far, kind of prove my last point…
Na nana nana na
I must agree, another crap article. If anyone disagrees with the way the country is going, they must surely be racists. How absurd. During the 60’s and 70’s anyone who didn’t agree with the administration, they were labeled Communists and Fascists. Since the 80’s, the keyword to call someone you don’t agree with is racist.
If you don’t agree, you must be a racist. Do you not understand how ignorant that is? I’m sure wasting as much money on the stimulus bill as the entire war in Iraq costs to date had nothing to do with it. The largest budget in history has nothing to do with it either. Nor does continuing to send money to foreign countries while Americans continue to lose jobs must not mean anything.
The problem with this country is people like you. Grown men tell their kids that they shouldn’t believe everything they see on television while they consciously do it themselves. MSNBC said the protests were racist, and you parrot what you see on television. A whole country full of people who are unread and tv-fed.
Hey Jonathon Davis:
Where in this article does the author ever level the charge of “racism”?
What he does, and quite handily, is show that everything these Tea Party protesters are supposedly challenging was actually rampant in the Bush Admiministration and is diminishing with the current administration.
What is wrong with you people who keep whining about being called “racists” when no one is calling *anyone* racist? Talk about ignorant!
Jonathon–pay attention to the article and challenge the facts in it, and quit relying on hot-button words like “racist”–you and your fellow apparently imbecilic commentaters are the only ones throwing that word around…
I do think it’s a hoot that you call out MSNBC but blithely ignore Fox’s Cody Willard throwing around words like “fascism” (what an idiot!) and CNBC’s Rick Santelli’s utterly ridiculous rant that began this whole thing with the tea bags. So pathetic. I love it when Santelli tries to say that he’s surrounded by a cross-section of America–he’s standing on a trading-room floor!
And I love how he and all the rest of you whine about this bailout that’s actually not helping the homeowenrs–it’s helping banks and mortgage companies; c’mon, isn’t that he way you like it? Money for those who already have it, while the rest suffer and struggle?
Please watch this – you might then understand why people are protesting
THE OBAMA DECEPTION
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eAaQNACwaLw
Wow- um- I think your opinion is clearly expressed,this article makes some great points-the biggest being that accusations of fascism are melodramatic.
Notice that none of these people has anything of substance to say- just ad hominem attacks.
You’re like: “hey, fascism is usually about nationalism, but Obama isn’t nationalistic.”
And they’re like: “you commie pinko!You are what’s wrong with America.”
There is not one mention of racism in this article- methinks y’all doth protest too much
The author’s right – if you look at what fascists really did and believed, there’s nothing like it in the Obama administration, but the Bush administration did lots of things that looked like it.
And seriously, I think half the commenters didn’t actually read the whole article – where is there any mention of racism in the article? I had to re-read it and still didn’t find anything like that. The main points seem to be:
1) Teabaggers protest taxation without representation, but they do have representation
2) Teabaggers protest tax hikes, but most of them got tax cuts from Obama
3) Teabaggers protest fascism, but the Bush administration was WAY more fascist.
Maybe they should protest the fact that they never learned to read.
Once again, Texas Slim’s articulate prose points out that which is not (unfortunately) common knowledge by informing the reader that the origins of the Tea Party dealt with “Taxation WITHOUT Representation”. Interestingly enough, our elected leaders were just that…elected! Once elected by the people for the people, I believe that we are, in fact, represented. The author has basically stated that while the right to protest is alive and strong in our community, as it should be, there seems to be a serious disconnect in some pertinent factual information.
As Texas Slim points out, the majority of those protesting APPEARED to be that of the population who would be receiving a tax cut, yet, the common protest was that of unfair taxation. Interestingly enough, once this was pointed out to the “Teabaggers”, a common argument was then turned to that of the current budget, suggesting that this is the “real” reason for the protest. Unfortunately, the budget currently set has yet to show a profound effect on the taxation of the protesters. While I am not suggesting that it may not at some point, I feel it to be more appropriate to protest an act once the act has, or is definitely about to, happen!
In regards to the fascism argument, when looking specifically at the structure of fascism, I found it laughable how this argument is actually taking place, especially after all of the events of the last administration that took place. Comparing the two administrations in regards to fascism is so ridiculous that this would best be saved for another article at another time. We can only hope that Texas Slim could present another well written piece diving in head first to educate those who seek that which (again) should be common knowledge.
Nice work, Slim.
Lets see if most of you can make it all the way through this post; ill try to go slow. I believe you are concentrating on the “harms” of fascism based on your experience with the subject. (world history, WW2) However just as we never actually saw communism (we actually saw a form of statism (China, Bolsheviks, Soviet union)) we never saw actual fascism (a little beside the point). You’ve just used the oldest smokescreen debate tactic in the book, congratulations. After reading the responses i’ve come to the conclusion that I always come to on a site like this; most of you don’t really understand the political spectrum. This paradigm of “liberal” left and conservative right is a misnomer put in place for your amusement and I can prove it, keep reading. This old tired paradigm is based on the extremely selective political atmosphere that has existed through ALL of American political history. To premise the USA IS NOT A DEMOCRACY. It never was and hopefully never will be. Here’s why, the ACTUAL political spectrum is absolute governmental power on the left to no power on the right in descending order. Good example: Dictatorship, oligarchy, democracy, republic, collective, anarchy. What we are now is an oligarchy, this is NOT disputable (try if you wish, but I warn I DO know what im talking about based on research not opinion or upbringing like most of the comments on here). Those of you who think we are not are obviously little traveled and little read. When you fully understand the concept then you’ll see how actual change can be achieved, and why this article and following comments are hilarious and superfluous. To open your minds up a little go read the “doors of perception.” Just as you probably cant understand the perceptive screen of being a Muslim, most of you are having trouble looking past your own opinions. Try to take anothers point of view with scientific, empathetic and sterile attitude and you’ll see your own ideas and beliefs refined and strengthened (or often change). While anothers beliefs to you are maybe backward or wrong, to condemn them outright is to be a fool and in all honesty that’s what wrong with this country. Its obvious that most of you have been raised on and fed too much television. (Most every channel on cable, satellite, newpapers and mainstream newsites are owned either by Reuters or AP and has been since the late 1890’s.(Both outlets are owned by the same people)) Before you panic, dont worry there are some out there who understand these subjects enough to form educated opinions. (Most of them are Libertarians lol)
This kind of hate toward the president is no joke. Even on the right-wing Fox “News” Shep Smith was talking about how scary his email is getting and how short a step it is from that kind of fear and anger to picking up a gun. And if people really believe he’s like Hitler, would it be a surprise if they tried to kill him or his supporters?