The Real Anti-iranian Forces

The politically correct left has portrayed people, who seek to defend America and to defeat her totalitarian enemies including the bloodthirsty ideology of Islamo-Fascism, as racists, bigots and/or Islamophobes. In fact, one article even claims that the worry many people have when it comes to a nuclear threat from Iran’s regime is because of the “united state’s racism again islam and the middle eastern people” [never mind that Islam is not even a race]. That article comes from the idiotic sentiment that any concern about the threat from Iran’s regime, which most people in Iran want to topple, is racist. So it’s essentially calling everyone, who is concerned about the growing threat from Iran’s evil Islamo-Fascist regime, racist. The funny thing is that that article was published on November 20, 2009, months after the Iranian people showed how much they hate that government after the 2009 “election” was stolen for Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who is well-known for calling for Israel to be “wiped off the map”.

When it comes to being concerned about Iran’s regime, we see that that regime and its apologists including many politically correct leftists accuse many people, who are concerned about the growing nuclear threat from Iran’s regime and focus on the evil nature of Iran’s regime, of being bigots and racist against Iranian people. But is that really so? Who is really anti-Iranian? Is it really people, who want to topple Iran’s regime? Is it really the people, who are concerned about the nuclear threat from the Iranian regime? Or is it really the forces of Islamization? The answer is the latter, not any of the former questions.

The truth is that Islam as a political ideology is the real anti-Iranian force. Contrary to what many decent people, who want the best for the world, believe, the problem didn’t simply begin in 1979. But that was when it came back. It really began when the ruthless Arab invaders, who were simply carrying out Muhammad’s mission of conquering the world and of subjugating the infidels, conquered Iran and acted like pirates. Arab conquerors came from an ideology of ignorance. Yet they are heroes of the politically correct left, which views Christopher Columbus as a genocidal mass murderer and America’s Founding Fathers as simply racist slave-owning rich white men. We hear from the politically correct left how these Arab conquerors brought “tolerance”. Yet the “tolerance” they brought over still got Dhimmis [that is non-Muslims, who were able to keep their faith] to be second-class citizens, who had to deal with severe persecution. Some “tolerance” that was. 

When Arab conquerors conquered Persia [Iran], they enslaved many Persians. They also burned the libraries and threw all the books into the sea on the grounds that “all of the knowledge is in the Koran”. The Arab Muslim invaders also destroyed Zoroastrian temples and killed scholars and Zoroastrian priests. The Arab invasion of Persia, like the Arab invasion of other countries/areas, was red as in the blood of its victims. 

Zoroastrians, who were the first Iranians, became, like Jews, Christians and other peoples, second-class Dhimmis, who were then treated as second-class citizens. Page 303 of the book Zoroastrians in Britain reported that appreciation of the persecution and oppression that Zoroastrians suffered under is part of Zoroastrian identity the same way that appreciation of anti-Semitism including the Holocaust is part of Jewish identity.  

Fezana Religious Education, a site for Zoroastrian Religious Education Teachers, reported:

The Arab invasion of Iran was quite different from that of Alexander, the Greek many centuries before. The purpose of the Arabs was not only to conquer but to spread Islam. Unlike the Greeks, the Arabs set out to destroy Zoroastrianism in Iran. This was accomplished not by killing Zoroastrians but by making laws and rules which made life difficult for Zoroastrians.

Zoroastrians, who were the first indigenous people of Persia [Iran], became a dwindling minority. Some converted to Islam because of perceived similarities they saw with Islam. Others converted in order to have an easier life by no longer being persecuted Dhimmis [though those, who did convert, were at least many times seen as second-class Muslims]. Those, who did convert, were unable to return back to their faith. For even today, former Muslims deal with death threats. For political Islam states that those, who leave Islam, must be killed. 

Many Zoroastrians fled to India in order to flee the persecution they dealt with under Islamic rule. 

In the nineteenth century, another religion was founded in Iran. It is known as the Bahai faith. The Islamic imperialists began to see Bahais seen as heretics. Thus, Bahais were persecuted and constantly massacred. 

Then came the Pahlavi dynasty, which was secular and sought to have as big a separation of mosque and state as possible. They looked positively on Iran’s pre-Islamic history. In fact, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, who is commonly known as “the Shah” even had parades where they celebrated the history of Iran’s pre-Islamic history by having many people in the parades dress as major figures from those times and march down the streets. 

The political left and Islamo-Fascists joined forces to portray the Shah as a blood thirsty tyrant. The 1979 Iranian revolution was mainly composed of Islamo-Fascists [led by Khomeini], Islamic Marxists [such as the MEK, which later served Saddam] and Communists [such as the Fedayeen and the Tudeh]. With Khomeini taking power in Iran, the system of Islamic Apartheid was reestablished. Since Khomeini took power, the Iranian regime is one of the most oppressive regimes in modern times and is dedicated to imposing an Islamo-Fascist caliphate around the world, where non-Muslims would be treated as second-class citizens. Non-Muslim minorities, like before in Iran under Islamic rule, became second-class citizens. 

The current Khomeinist regime in Iran is even committing a holocaust against Bahais. The Bahais aren’t even one of the “recognized” minorities in Iran [the "recognized" minorities in Iran are Jews, Christians and Zoroastrians]. The “recognized” minorities still are allowed to have someone in their communities have one seat in the “parliament”. However, those guys from their communities don’t have any power, for they basically have to agree with Iran’s islamo-Fascist regime on everything. And the Bahais don’t even have that. Bahais have become one of the biggest victims of Iran’s evil terroristic Islamo-Fascist regime. 

But that’s not to say that the “recognized” minorities aren’t facing persecution. They’re still being persecuted. If one of their family members convert to Islam, that family member automatically gets all of the inheritance money. In cases of rape, if a non-Muslim man rapes a Muslim woman, that man is executed. But if a Muslim man rapes a non-Muslim woman, that man would just have to pay some money. That is some examples of persecution. And if any of these groups talk about persecution, then they would have to deal with retribution from the Iranian regime. That’s why Iranian Jewish leaders told Karmal Melamed, an Iranian American Jewish journalist, to be careful what he says about Iran’s regime because Iran’s Jewish minority would face retribution.

Right now, pro-democracy and human rights activists are tortured and/or killed by the Iranian regime because they want freedom and democracy. The Iranian regime hangs Homosexuals and stones women. In Iran, any disagreement with the ruling regime can result in torture and/or killing. Iran’s regime is not only anti-Semitic, anti-woman, Homophobic, anti-Christian, anti-Bahai and anti-Zoroastrian. The Iranian regime is also anti-human. 

I’m not an Iranian. But I’m a right-wing Jewish nationalist. The same forces that victimize Zoroastrians, Bahais and other non-Muslims [Jews among them] seek to destroy Israel. Plus, supporting the struggle to democratize Iran and bringing awareness about how Islamization victimized Iran is part of engaging in Tikun Olam, which is the Jewish concept of  making the world better. People talk about supporting those, who seek freedom, during Passover Seders. I also wrote this article and bring awareness about this in order to shed light on the politically correct left-wing hypocrisy. 

When Muslim conquerors conquered Iran [and other places], Jews and Christians were among those who became second-class Dhimmis. But Iran is not the only country that has been victimized by the Arab conquest and the Islamization that came after it. Coptic Christians, who were the indigenous population in Egypt prior to the Islamic conquest, then became second-class Dhimmis and became a persecuted minority that is constantly shrinking. 

This is an example of how hypocritical politically correct leftists are. It’s so funny how politically correct leftists accuse opponents of the Iranian regime of being bigots, racists and/or Islamophobes. Opponents of the Iranian regime are accused of being bigots against Iranian people. Iranians, who oppose their regime, are accused by politically correct leftists of all the same stuff and of being sell-outs, who kiss up to white racists. So by that idiotic “logic”, then most Iranian people would be racist against themselves and sell outs because they seek to free their country from the evil Mullahs and Ayatollahs in power. Meanwhile, while people, who oppose the regime and bring awareness about the global threat that regime poses, are accused of being anti-Iranian bigots. But the real anti-Iranian bigots are Islamic imperialists, starting with the backward Arab conquerors, who brutally conquered Persia in a bid to conquer the world for Islam and to subjugate the infidels. Because of around three decades of suffering under an anti-human regime, the Iranian people now understand how horrible it is to live under Islamo-Fascist rule. The Iranian regime even has contempt of Iran’s pre-Islamic history. Khomeini said, “We do not worship Iran, we worship Allah. For patriotism is another name for paganism. I say let this land [Iran] burn. I say let this land go up in smoke, provided Islam emerges triumphant in the rest of the world.” Not only that, but the Iranian regime was even destroying the tomb of Firuzan [Abu Lulu], who was resisting the brutal Arab invasion of Persia. 

The article on the Persian Mirror reported:

The tomb of Firuzan commonly known as Emamadeh Abu-lolo (or Abu Lulu) in Kashahn, Isfahan province is being destroyed by decree of the Islamic Republic of Iran’s President Ahmadinejad. Following a Cultural Policy coherent supported since the victory of the Revolution back in 1979, where anything deemed ‘Taghouti’ aka ‘Royalist’ or particularly not deemed ‘Islamic’ should be wiped out. 

That evil desicion by the Iranian regime to destroy that tomb got plenty of the Iranian people to protest. One of them said,“His [Firuzan] action was in response to atrocities that were committed by Arab-Muslim invaders in Iran, which resulted in massacre, rape, looting of our country – we Iranians never forgot nor forgive their crimes against us”.

 And the joke is that according to politically correct leftists, we’re the bigots against Iranian people. Why? Because we raise awareness about the threat Iran’s nuclear weapons program poses to protect the free world and because we expose the evil anti-human nature of Iran’s regime. According to politically correct leftists, that makes us bigots and racists against Iranians. But brutally attacking the country, having a ruthless occupation of that country and even having an anti-human regime there is okay, according to these hypocritical politically correct leftists. If this is not hypocrisy, I don’t know what the hell hypocrisy is. I hope this article does a wonderful job in exposing the hypocrisy of politically correct leftists.