NATO Standing: Institution and Self-Sufficiency

NATO is believed to have worked-out its function in deploying its troops to Afghanistan.  More better that what ISAF (International Security Assistance Force) could offer and accomplish as well.  What is its real mission?  Is it obvious that NATO is following the life and movements of people who believe in war in order to be famous and to be well deserving of (with) their combat forces/troops.  Each branch of military in any nation is aptly trained to preserve life (or lives) and to defend authority in rebuilding whatever progress is laid-down.

Who faces the odds against the NATO?  The Talibans, who dare to honor their leader and fight with their belief that peaceful beginnings, tend to slow down the phase of modernization accompanied by science’s invention through technology, professionals and scholarly-acts.

Is NATO overstaying in Afghanistan?  Do they have a surprise in rebuilding and institutionalizing military offensive within the region? People live and grow up, then families are raised into each own generation to ear-marked and establish a legacy of its own.  The alliances of USA, POLAND, UK, CANADA, NETHERLANDS AND GERMANY are robust enough to provide what is needed and necessary to reconstruct Afghanistan from south to west.

Peace building care-of the military is carrying the same magnitude within the ranks of the civilian in Afghanistan.  There are mandatory elements for peace to exists and survive to make its state believable, saleable, and profitable.  The Afghans need:

1. Electricity – power generations,
2. Jobs – articulate professionals which are conducive to current (reality) Afghan necessities,
3. Roads – channel to pathways to connecting links within the region and perhaps,
4. Teachers – mentors and leaders to provide ideas and concepts leading the ideology of peace progression.

Then such institution will grow and take pride to building other various institutions.

Self-sufficiency is not so hard to achieve.  By example, NATO concerns could be related to four (4) aspects, namely:

1. Coordination Factor – their objectivity and executable plans need mutual transparency,
2. Determined Officials – their choosing and selecting through careful exchange of liaison officers is very vital,
3. Utilization Membrane – their naming of tasks (relevant functions) common and realistic need to be an established force, and
4. Sublimation Principles – their conclusive understanding between leading personalities in organizations need to be delimited to minimum to attain certainty of purpose/aim.

It is always good habit to execute missions within the boundaries of attainable grounds.  Finger-pointing should not be the NATO’s habit (for such might hold a weapon at large) but instead, a proper salute to a well organized command order to a peaceful solution on Afghanistan’s road to progress is recommendable.