Super-injunctions: Twitter User Legal_aids Returns with New Injunction Cases
Published by Spencer Hawken on June 20, 2011 in International Relations-
0
Liked it 
Subscribe to RSS
Secret Twitter user Sue Mae (a play on words for Sue Me!) has returned, with some updated information on old tweets, as well as some brand new cases.
Popular twitter user Legal_AIDS (Sue Mae) has sprung back to life with a new series of tweets.Sue Mae sprang to life a month ago, after the Ryan Giggs/Imogen Thomas scandal broke, at that point they exposed many of England’s best known characters, and their mucky secrets.
In the latest series of tweets the user reports on a Tottenham Hotspur player who had two sexual encounters just prior, and just after his wedding.
Updates on the now well known Fred Goodwin story.
A suicide attempt by a former Prime Minister’s daughter.
A Manchester City players affair with a “leggy 23” woman, and the almost prosecution of Giles Coren.
One of the world’s richest men has a super-injunction with hints of slave labor, and possible corruption links to the former government.
How one of Britain’s richest men is a frequent user of prostitutes, and the links he shares.
A television presenters love of S & M and scat activity.
How a popular singer was involved in a blackmail plot, and what was contained on a stolen computer.
An A-list presenters relationship with a woman on disability living allowance, behind his wife’s back.
A banker who stole $22 million.
And another presenter who had an affair with his ex-wife.
Legal_AIDS also reports that a further four footballers/football managers have been engaged in affairs. Updates on information regarding a athlete pedophile and the devastating effects his actions have caused. And repeats some of the old tweets.
Each tweet is followed up with documentation, which includes court documents, and newspaper web-pages that add realism to the tweeters comments.
A previous tweet, has been removed, in a case which the tweeter has been proven wrong, however the tweeter returns to that case, now with evidence regarding the super injunction. The tweeter does not apologize or refute their earlier tweeInjunction Casest.
