Blowing Hot and Cold, or Street Rowdyism?
Article Tools
-
0
Liked it
Subscribe to RSS
Take a lesson from the American media.
- First, accuse Hillary Clinton of supporting NAFTA because her husband signed it.
- When she said she does not, accuse her staff member of supporting NAFTA, calling for his blood.
- Now when he is fired, demand that super-delegates do not give their votes to her as she keeps on changing her election staff.
What are they implying?
Is it that, if she is made President, she will go on changing her Cabinet Staff every other day?
Changing staff is a Presidential prerogative as given by the constitution. If a President finds that a staff member has outgrown his or her usefulness, he or she is definitely going to be asked to step down. Rarely congressional committees try to interfere with that Presidential authority.
Moreover, changing staff members is not something Hillary Clinton invented.
In their endeavor to become super-constitution makers, our media people are showing their utter ignorance about such matters. Not only that, they are exposing their unworthiness for their jobs.
It is high time for American media barons to change some, if not most, of their comely but ignorant staff, who think that sensationalism is the only thing the art of journalism is made of.
They showed their immaturity by thinking that Hillary Clinton can be driven away using dirty tricks, which even a kid will be ashamed to use even though they were all in adult suits.
In fact she proved her mettle by surviving and persisting this far against every obstacle the media put in her path.
When their efforts to insult her with a hired scarecrow who called her a b****, the media recruited one from their own fold to insult Chelsea Clinton with p****** and another to call Hillary a w****.
If these people -men or hermaphrodites- do not know how to treat women properly, they are not fit for their jobs. Otherwise, their moneyed employers also may be displaying their pedigree.
Probably, those are the very names they use to call their own women-folk.
If this is the type of vocabulary our media people picked up in their journalism classes, then it is high time our universities revamped their journalism curricula.
Otherwise, they may better rename their journalism courses as “Courses in Street Rowdyism”.










