Obama: Speech Patterns Analyzed
Article Tools
-
16
Liked it
Subscribe to RSS
This is but a short analysis of Obama’s speech patterns emerging in his last few speeches in the presidential race and his victory address in Chicago.
Reviewing the last few speeches of Obama, including his victory address held in Chicago, I came to a startling conclusion. He is using preacher’s oratory speech patterns to give rhythm to his address. By this trick he keeps the listeners attentive to his speech, a fact which had emerged already at the Democratic Congress in 2004, but eluded explanation then.
When you go through his speeches and keep yourself detached from what he says, but listen only to the way he says it, you could be sitting in any small church in a black neighbourhood in the United States. The ebb and flow of his voice and the intonations he uses are from a preacher’s rhetoric repertoire.
Listen to the audience then. Like church followers, they intonate the ‘Yes, we can’ like Amen or Halleluiah. Obama’s speeches are patterned to pitch on sentences that will provoke this ‘Yes, we can’ over and over. If you watch the faces of the listeners, you will see in their faces the rapture of true believers, not voters at a rally.
Add to all this Messianic terms and promises he constantly used. The promise of change and a new, better world for everybody has always been the mainstay of Messianic messages, true and false. It is further no coincidence that it’s after his Messianic promises the ‘Yes, we can’ is provoked in the audience.
If it will make his life as President any easier having followers and believers in addition to the normal voters, will be seen. It might help make the bad medicine go down when he really gets going on the present problem. It might also stiffen his back when he goes after the true culprits of the crises besetting the land and the world.











9 Comments
Jesus! Now you point it out…;))) Disclaimer: ( I was encouraged by the writer of this great article to place my comment)
)
Clarification: I encouraged above reader to place A comment
Very observant! Whether Obama will be an effective president or not remains to be seen, considering the crises he will be facing when he occupies the White House. There are so many politicians who give a lot of promises that turn out to be empty.
I think it funny when someone found out he um, borrowed parts of speeches from older political speeches, but, what I found very funny was seeing an old Nixon button that read, “Nixon, the Change we need”. The yes we can is from a commercial that has been running for two years. Obama had great speeck borrowers, and as any good used car salesman he used the words to sell his position to power. I think it is wonderful to see a black man get in, you know, the first black man. its a shame that he will fail. I am sure it would have made a great story for the history books if he was a real winner and not a media shoe-in. Remember, he was gonna change the world only three months ago, heck, even on month ago, what the heck, he was gonna change the world a few weeks ago but in his speech on the day he won, he said, “It might not be in a year or even two, or even THE FIRST TERM.” This is a democratic trick to start the re-election process. I am sure he will fail and play the blame game on the old admin. Do you know why, Because he can, yes he can. Reminds me of Sig Heil,(Hail Victory) Sig Heil Sig Heil, Yes we can, yes we can, yes we can.
Thank you eddiego65. They have to be good at something …
Bob D Caterino, I hope you don’t mind my correcting your spelling: Sieg Heil, and Heil Hitler were the two awful slogans in that time. The rest is explained in my other articles on politics and war criminals.
It will be interesting to see if President-Elect Obama overtakes Mr and Mrs Clinton as leading figures in the Democratic Party. Up to now, it appears that his following could approach Pres. Reagan’s on the other side of the fence.
The question is how big the margin is between the two camps. From the European side of the pond it seems so small as to e non-existent.
I don’t mind any corrections. I am dyslexia and always have someone edit for me but not this time. I wrote something when Carter got elected. “The democrats always do the same thing, first they promise everything under the sun. Once in they get in office, they say, oh my god, things are worse then I thought and we can’t do everything we promised.” Then they raise taxes and we toss them out four years later. Clinton did it, Obama is doing it. Now whatsup with all the state of the union adresses? Obama says their can only be one president at a time but the thing is, he thinks it’s him. Last but least, five thousand bathrooms for two million people? What is he thinking. Yes we can is not going to work here. He spent more for his swearing in then the past four presidents combined. Now, who said they were going to stop government spending?
Good grief, who would want to stop government spending? !!
Money is a figment of our imagination, what is in plus in private hands (mostly in rich, corrupt few hands) is counterbalanced by countries’ negative balance sheet. If you put them all to zero, no money will fuel any wars anymore, to make the rich richer.
What a blasphemious thought!