White House Insider Ulsterman Debunked: Republican Terror Hoax Explained
-
3
Liked it 
Subscribe to RSS
White House Insider Ulsterman Debunked: Republican Terror Hoax Explained
Ulsterman’s main topic is Barack Obama.
Ulsterman is afraid of Obama and he wants you to be afraid of Obama as well.
Fear!
White House Insider Ulsterman Debunked: Republican Terror Hoax Explained
Let us be real.
Have you ever noticed all the online terror of Ulsterman the Republican?
Or maybe you are one of those who believe every word that Ulsterman spit out against Obama in his Ulsterman Reports and “interviews” with the White House Insider?
It is interesting that proud, patriotic Republicans on the positions always do their best to provide a real terror for American citizen.
It is funny to observe how the Republicans from the bottom and the Republican voters always fall for the same old lies.
Fear.
That is what Republicans are all about.
Fear of the immigrants, fear of the communists, fear of the the terrorists (scary), fear of the Liberals, fear of the Democrats…
The list of Republican fears goes on and on.
No wonder Ulsterman is doing the same: creating the fear and delivering it through his Triond articles while making some money along the way.
Ulsterman’s main topic is Barack Obama.
Ulsterman is afraid of Obama and he wants you to be afraid of Obama as well.
Fear!
Terror!
So Ulsterman is fabricating stories to spread his hatred and install the fear into a Republican heart.
And he is doing ti with ease.
Republican terror hoax explained, Ulsterman debunked.
Ohio State Suspended After Miami Hurricanes and Positive Doping Tests
Breaking: 9/11 Was an Inside Job Obama Says!
Nice picture. Scary nice. Must be republican. Thanks.
good share
“must be republican…”
Weak weak weak.
Weak writing, weak analysis, weak pic.
yeah you’re right, I mean left. Terror, by definition, isn’t scary anymore. It’s a republican (gosh that word alone should make us fear – oh wait) plot. Yeah, republicans shout “allahu akbar ” as they explode from their lies -oh wait, that’s someone else.
Soooo your argument to call him a liar, and then declare his site \”debunked\”. How does that work?