The Ulsterman Report: Once Again, Sarah Palin Emerges Stronger
Published by Ulsterman on January 13, 2011 in World Politics-
7
Liked it 
Subscribe to RSS
Immediately after the tragedy of the Tucson shooting became known, the liberal media and members of the Democratic Party attempted to unfairly place blame on Sarah Palin. Once again, Palin emerges from these attacks stronger, revealing the inane hatred that bubbles just beneath the surface of leftist American politics.
The script had been formulated long before the first bullet of deranged shooter Jared Lee Loughner rang out just outside a Safeway in Tucson Arizona last week. The liberal wing of the Democratic Party, still gnashing their teeth over the rebuke against them in the November Midterm Elections, were desperate for a scapegoat. The equally liberal media were only too happy to assist them by once again failing to actually report the facts, but rather quickly make those facts up to more fully coordinate with the much-desired outcome – that the shooting in Arizona was the result of rightwing bigotry, vitriol, rhetoric…etc.
The primary target of these attacks, once again, was Sarah Palin.
It remains a mystery why Palin so enrages the left. From one side of their mouth they attempt to marginalize her as an inconsequential moron, some Alaskan redneck former beauty pageant breeder of too many children. At the same time, they declare her dangerous, cunning, a too-powerful figure corrupting the minds of mainstream America. The many contradictions contained within the liberals’ hatred (yes, I am using that word – because it is appropriate) of Sarah Palin willfully goes unnoticed by them. They simply march on, gleeful in their collective and repeated attacks against the former governor of Alaska. Sarah Palin is a woman. Sarah Palin is a conservative. Sarah Palin is Pro-Life. Sarah Palin is pro-gun rights. Sarah Palin talks of her love of God and country. Sarah Palin has the audacity to openly (and effectively) mock liberalism. We must destroy her.
And so on that terrible day last week in Tucson, these same liberals, politicians and media figures alike, grabbed from the same script and pointed to Sarah Palin as the murder weapon. The deserving evidence? Non-existent of course – but in the odd and emotionalized world of the liberal mind, evidence and facts are mere suggestions – the outcome is the only thing that truly matters. Destroy Sarah Palin – by any means necessary. For by destroying Sarah Palin, by blaming her for the killings in Tucson, liberals hoped to destroy the Tea Party, and the now growing conservative movement throughout the United States. Grandiose you say? Perhaps – but it is also true.
First to the scene were the liberal bloggers such as Daily Kos who took a map Palin utilized months ago targeting specific districts in the November elections. This kind of map is nothing new, having been used by both Democrats and Republicans a number of times in the past. The DNC utilized just such a map in 2004, and longtime Democratic Party strategist Bob Beckel admitted such mapping and the term “targeting” has been around as long as he has been in politics – and ironically, the Daily Kos had “targeted” Giffords’ district most recently, as they felt she was far too conservative to be trusted. A long rant on the Kos blog stated repeatedly that Giffords was “dead” due to her vote against Nancy Pelosi.
The mainstream media though happily took its cue from the far left liberal bloggers and pushed ahead with the Palin election map. Look! Palin is the true killer! Even as mounting evidence suggested the shooter had nothing to do with the Tea Party, Sarah Palin, Fox News, or even politics as a whole, the media persisted. Even though Congresswoman Giffords was well known by her District and inside the Beltway as a political moderate who had most recently voted against Nancy Pelosi as House Leader, the media persisted. Even as former friends of Jared Loughner described him as a liberal radical who blamed former President Bush for 9/11, the media persisted. ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, MSNBC – all of them, hour after hour, insinuated the shooting was the by-product of conservative rhetoric, with Sarah Palin being held up as the prime example. Far left New York Times columnist Paul Krugman made the case against Palin with his typical vacuous snideness, blanketing conservatives with the description of “hate mongers”. John Nichols of The Nation was even more misleading with the facts than most, forging a full on misrepresentation of Jared Loughner as a far-right extremist upset over Giffords’ vote for Obamacare and taking cues from Palin’s now infamous statement that conservatives should not retreat but “reload” when battling liberalism. Here is a video showing the appalling contradiction of media coverage regarding the Arizona shootings vs the Fort Hood massacre of a year earlier:
And what is the outcome of all of this concerted effort by far left liberals to portray Sarah Palin and conservatism as the cause of the Tucson Tragedy? If anything, liberals have simply managed to once again further marginalize themselves in the eyes of America. Conservatives are rallying to defend Palin, and with polls indicating the vast majority of the public recognizes the liberal slant blame-game that has been the coverage following the shooting, so too are many independents ignoring the liberal media and Democratic politicians.
As for Sarah Palin herself, she has again emerged a stronger figure than before. Even Barack Obama, during his speech at this week’s Tucson memorial service, seemingly sided with Palin in dismissing the Far Left’s attempts to place blame outside of the singular actions of a deranged gunman. Whether or not Sarah Palin can develop into a viable Republican candidate for President of the United States remains to be seen, but one thing is certain – as an ever-popular conservative voice, she will not be silenced. She will repeatedly prove her worth in battling the liberal horde and revealing the insipid hatred always bubbling beneath the surface that is the mainstream media and DC politics.
Don’t retreat Sarah.
Reload…
______
JOIN THE ULSTERMAN ON FACEBOOK!
Very powerful ending Ulsterman! Bravo!
There is a legitimate place for guns. The second amendment is for national security, including the security of liberty against a government which no longer respect what The Declaration describes as “inaleinable rights” which are “endowed by their Creator” (The Declaration).
The Declaration further states:
“But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.”
There is both legitimate literal and metaphorical “lock and load.” Mrs. Palin, I think, has referred exclusively to the metaphorical sort. But, per the founding fathers, there is apparently another legitimate sort.
Having no moral arguments, the left denies explicit mention of the literal “lock and load” rhetoric. Thus the left resorts to open slander of the lovely Mrs. Palin.
This study reveals that the right might also do well to assert the legitimate literal “lock and load” rhetoric against a tryannical government which–with its medical death panels, disregard for the Creator’s endowment of the right to life, spreading the hatred of class warfare…—usurps individual rights
graet photo and good article . I think this is an important article
You see Ulstermann you cheap hack, the Tea Party is NOT a conservative movement. Do you get your information from watching television?
The REAL Tea Party wants to:
End the Wars
Audit the Federal Reserve
End government corruption.
Reduce the size of government ( like returning control of education to the states instead of the federal level )
Restoring the Constitution ( like ending the Patriot act )
The Tea Party HATES Neocons.
Now I want you to tell me Ulstermann, because you are such a knowledgable jounralist, where Sarah Palin the NEOCON stands on these issues?
Oh right! She is against them all!
Do you have any idea what a schmuck you look like?
Do you honestly call yourself a respectable journalist?
This is the Tea Party, and everything else is fake, just like your researching skills…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DKZmIzEMUN8
Have a nice day!
very nice share.
Sarah Palin is a Neo-Con, snoop cat? Was she invited to the Bilderberg convention?
“the Tea Party is NOT a conservative movement”
snoop-cat, I disagree. The Tea Party IS a conservative movement. *True* conservatism, not this current pseudo-conservative Republican Party garbage. Real conservatism is what the Tea Party is about, like fiscal responsibility and smaller government. That’s what the Republican Party *should* be about, but hasn’t been.
great job. i like it
Wow, Jerl, love the vitriol. Thank you for proving his point. Idiot.
Does Ulsterman the yellow journalist know that 90% of Sarah Palins talking points comes from an FDR style democrat named Lyndon LaRouche?
Even Michelle Malkin is ripping off Lyndon LaRouche.
You are a joke Ulstermann.
http://larouchepac.com/
Jerl the Obama Zombie continues to prove the IQ of the Obots.
Perfect example of brainwash 101 and the by-product of that poison. Vintage Obamabot
As for the vicious attacks on Palin, there is something about
her that just drives libnuts insane. The attacks should be investigated, she should sue for hate crimes legislated by the Dumbocraps and the Commocrats.
I like Palin, but she has been a main force of attack by the radical Communist left aka Commocrat Party, and the Rinos and most of the Libertarians. They are all traitors.
Good Job Ulstermann as always. You also drive these libnuts and Obots insane. Go easy on them, they can\’t deal with facts.
Being a liberal radical is a mental disease for which there is no cure.
The end of this article literally turned my stomach. Why continue to fuel the fire of vitriol? Sarah Palin is more full of hate than many liberal figures put together, and her words continue to show it. I am not blaming her for this tragedy, but I am blaming her for her childish tactics and toxic means of communicating her “side.” There are some psyches I will never understand.
Anna, you are giving me a bad name. Please stop.
Palin is not full of vitrol. The left is. And, has been for as long as I can remember.
You should look at the NYT story on this issue if you want to see pure vitrol. No One Listened to Gabrielle Giffords.
Ain’t it so, Texas Secession! You nailed it.
Guess the Left has little to complain about regarding vitrol, nor the phony guy in the WH. He as the supposed leader of our country said this:
** Obama on ACORN Mobs: “I don’t want to quell anger. I think people are right to be angry! I’m angry!”
** Obama to His Mercenary Army: “Hit Back Twice As Hard”
** Obama on the private sector: “We talk to these folks… so I know whose ass to kick.“
** Obama to voters: Republican victory would mean “hand to hand combat”
** Obama to lib supporters: “It’s time to Fight for it.”
** Obama to Latino supporters: “Punish your enemies.”
** Obama to democrats: “I’m itching for a fight.”
This man has no right to now act all self righteous, nor his minions who have zilch on this type speech.
I meant to say “his minions who have zilch to say on this type of speech.”
Let me time to see how long it takes for them to respond about how it’s OK for the Left and the man in the WH to say this type of speech and then act all sanctimonious about Palin and others of the conservative bent. Timing………………….
Only in your sad, twisted world is Palin stronger Ulster Idiot.
Your are also wrong about the left wanting to bring her down. The best thing that could happen is for Palin to be nominated.
She will be exposed as the know nothing vacuum she is.
Obama will be re-elected whatever happens. He is the man.
Bigging up Palin only helps him but you haven’t the brains to see that, Ulster Idiot.
Go back to your farm and stop trying to play with the big boys.
oooooooo, the comments from the “peaceful” and sanctimonious left.
Who are the hate mongers with inflammatory speech? continue on as you have done since Bush was President. *yawn*
SAYS YOU! SARAH PALIN IS AN IGNORANT HACK! She is a quitter and a crappy person who can’t keep her dumb mouth shut when she should know better. She also doesn’t write her own speeches, its very obvious.
^ more from the sanctimonious left.
Thank you for letting the whole world see how leftists think.
I couldnt help but laugh at some of the comments from the obama lovers … their arguements about Palin sound like a 2 year old having a fit because they cant have their way.. LOL All mean spirited liberals can do nothing but call others childish names. And DD237 says Palin does even write her own speeches!!! ha ha ha ha ha ha!! … like obama does?? Obama cant even talk to a Kindergarten class without a teleprompter!!!
You lose all credit for defending Palin. She’s an idiot.
Also, you americans should shut up, leave the guns to the military and do some working instead of whining.
That is all.
Acid, no, it\’s the leftists that look like idiots for the continual attacks upon Palin. If she were such an ineffectual leader why would the left spend so much time and energy attacking her??? What are you all so afraid of?
An ignorant “idiot” that can\’t lead, or use her brain? LOL! Your lies give you away.
You are all scared of this woman obviously. Tell me………..why all the energy and money spent on all this venom if you aren’t?
Are Ulsterman and Pat Dollard the Same Person?