This is the Real Cost of the Iraq War
Article Tools
-
248
Liked it
Subscribe to RSS
Based on the evidence of years of fighting, it seems as though the war has continued at a large price to the human race all over the world.
We hear everyday of more soldiers losing their lives in the Iraq and think of their poor families left behind to mourn their deaths. To date as a rough estimate based on cross-check data between news reports, suggest that so far the war has claimed the lives of:
- Over 600, 000 Iraqi men and women (the population of the entire country of Luxembourg is under 500,000)
- More than 4,000 American servicemen and women
- British forces; 175 lives
- The injured stands at more than 20,000 American soldiers, and more than 1,400 British soldiers with numbers rising constantly

The Real Cost to the Living
In 2006, the US had set aside 315 billion dollars for the Iraqi and the Afghanistan wars, but the cost of the Iraqi war alone has since been estimated at about 3 trillion US dollars or 1.5 trillion British pounds.
It was said then, that if 315 was stored in 1 dollar notes, the stack would be the height and thickness of a 38 story building, and if you were to line the notes up side by side, they would be long enough to wrap the Moon around its middle almost 3 times. But that was 315 billion.
On the other hand, I couldn’t really understand what 3 trillion dollars (£ 1.5 trillion) was, but apparently it’s a million times a million and looks like this when written out, 3,000,000,000,000 (12 zeros).
I still could not comprehend such a large amount, so I tried to put it in terms that would make its literal meaning it more easily understood. To put it in perspective, if I could somehow manage to stay alive for about 3,000 years, I would have to spend a million dollars a day in order to spend 3 trillion. So way before Jesus Christ’s mother Mary was born, I would’ve been spending a million dollars a day, and would still be spending as we speak.

What could this money be spent on instead of the war
- $3 trillion would provide clean drinking water for every last individual who needs it
- Totally eradicate world poverty
- Buy gas for every driver in the US for 10 years
- Educate, house and feed every last Aids orphaned child in Africa for 10 years
- Provide Primary education for every child on earth
- Provide free medical care for 16 million Americans (money spent on the war each day)
- Send 43 million students to University in England
Taxpayers in the UK and in the US are paying out more than £2,000 (nearly $4,000) a second into the war (so in the time it took you to read from the top of this page to here, you’ve spent £ 240, 000 on the war). Every day more is being spent, and when America pledged £18million (nearly $36million) into the United Nations’ refugee agency, the public did not realise that this very amount is spent in less than three hours in Iraq to sustain a steadily failing war.
The obvious cost of mental and physical rehabilitation of soldiers would mean that steadily, more money has to be allocated. Money that wouldn’t have to be spent in the first place if there was no war, but that’s a different story.
Meanwhile, Mr Bush below has got to answer to the families of the dead soldiers whose pictures so poignantly make up the mural of his face.

Faced with the agonising choice of feeding the poor and providing water for millions of children who walk half a day to obtain one bucket for their families’ needs, our governments have taken the path of war. We and our children meanwhile, live with the consequences
This is how the New York times so succinctly summarised it in this accompanying chart. Based on the hefty difference between the smallest (a necessary way to save lives) and the largest (a certain way to lose lives), it is up to you to decide where the human life places on the governments’ list of importance.
It is estimated that The war is costing $720 million a day or $500,000 a minute, according to an analysis of the work of Nobel Prize-winning economist Joseph E. Stiglitz and Harvard public finance lecturer Linda J. Bilmes











91 Comments
It is sad to know there are lives at risk, and see the money spent in this way..Great awareness, and wonderful article…
It is really very sad that so many people losing their lives. And I am surprised to know such a large amount is spent.
It is a very sad situation. A great waste of money and human life.
I hadn’t realised how much money was being spent, and the way that the NY Times laid it out side by side with what could be done with the money, is quite an eye-opener.
Very good article, thanks!
Ann, This article scares me a little bit. My cousin is in Bagdad… but heres the thing.. if we pull out of Iraq now, we will have to go back there in the future and then that could be worse than it is now..
Thanks for your comments everyone. Yes these figures are terribly scary. Alexa, I’m sorry, but I didn’t understand your comment. Why would you HAVE to go back? I thought that the reason given for the war was to oust Saddam. He is now gone, has the reason suddenly changed or was the reason given a lie in the first place.
Most of the present killing in Iraq is because the troops are there. The Iraqis want them out. What makes us better than a whole nation of people that gives us the right to MAKE them allow strangers they do not want in their own country.
I am not taking sides, I just didn’t understand your comment that’s all.
I hope you will keep writing about this. The more that is written the more people will come to understand. The cost of war is unreal, and so much could be done if we worked for peace in the world. The real cost is human lives and who they are or where they live doesn’t matter. We are all human beings. Thank you.
Very well written information. It’s a shame that we have to spend that much money for a war, when we cannot even afford to keep americans in housing.
Yes, it is overwhelming how much has been spent. Not just the money bothers me, but the lives lost. I see it quite a bit here at Fort Bragg, unfortunately. My husband is about to leave for Iraq a fourth time. I just don’t think it’s worth it.
The loss is more than we can imagine to all the famlies who have lost husbands, and children to this senseless war, not to mention the monetary loss. It is all loss and nothing gained.
People like you really need to get a life.
Anne, you have written a brilliant article, and to #12 God bless you for doing what you thought right, and being willing to die for your country. It is people like you that protect our right to voice our opinions and live without fear. But no one has ever given me a plausible reason to be in this war to begin with.
…very nice article,,,i guess the US should get out of Iraq, people are dying, trillions of money are being wasted w/c could had been used to address the worldwide problems on hunger and poverty…whats the “big deal” why they don’t wanna leave Iraq?is it because of it’s oil reserved?just asking,,.. it had been proven that there were no biological weapons in there,,.come on…step out… let the people of Iraq solve their own problem….and i’m sure they can resolve their own problems…
I’m not going to comment on the content of this article, however, there is one inaccury here. You claim that if you spent 1 million dollars a day for 3,000 years, you would have spent 3 trillion dollars. This is incorrect, and here’s why:
Days in 1 year (forgetting leap years) = 365
Days in 3,000 years = 365 * 3,000 = 1,095,000
Multiply this by 1 million (dollars a day) = 1,095,000 * 1,000,000 = 1,095,000,000,000
This is just 1.095 trillion dollars. To spend 3 trillion would require just over 8,219 years.
Thanks,
Donal
I understand that the actual figure would be a little lower when leap years were count and much lower if inflation is firgured in.
Thank you so much Donal,for pointing this inaccuracy out. You’re obviously better at figures than I am. I’m not so good with maths. Over 8,000 years! Wow!
I agree with #15. This article sheds light only on the negative parts of the war. You say you aren\’t choosing sides, but you are only giving attention to one side.
The original mission was to remove Saddam from power and that needed to be done (Yes, I am aware that the US put Saddam in power), but the mission has come to be the stabilization of Iraq. That will not happen if we withdraw without being certain that Iraq has the capabilities to maintain itself.
One last note: I am strongly against the use of misleading statistics. Without accurate, reliable data in front of me, I will not question the statement that 600,000 Iraqis have died. What I will question is the relevance of this number. The 2007 estimate of Iraq\’s population was just over 29 million. That means that 600,000 is 0.02% of the population. You also compare this number to the population of a European that is under 1,000 square miles in area. If you wanted you could just as easily compare it to the population of Milwaukee, WI, which has a population of just over 600,000 according to the 2006 census.
I am not trying to belittle the value of a life lost; I am merely attempting to put numbers in a more statistically correct format.
I find this Bush picture to be racially offensive. What kind of Rush Limbaughs would make a picture of the president and put most of the “people of color” behind his head and all the white people on his nose? It is segregation all over again.
And its all about the rich “tax payers” and sending all the upper class to England universities.
Kyle, it is very hard to take you seriously if you think that 600,000 is only .02% of 29m. It is actually considerably over 2%.
Kyle, thanks for your comment, it’s much appreciated, but I have 2 questions of my own.
1. Who made you superior to the Iraqi people to the point where you have to make sure that they “have the capabilities to maintain themselves” ? I would’ve thought that nations were autonomous and didn’t need other people who, with their twisted illusion of superiority, take it upon themselves to direct the future of millions of people about whom they know nothing.
2. Would your reaction to lives lost be so matter-of-factly if God forbid, the entire population of Milwaukee (which you mentioned) is consumed and annihilated by an outside nation. Would this also merely be the spoils of war?
Number 15 whom you sided with - I haven’t answered that comment before because I have already covered that redundant speech. I shall put it simply again for him.
Saddam was wicked
They said, “Let’s go to war to kick the bad man out!”
The bad man is out.
Now tell me why there is still a war going on?
Anne, this is a poignant post, and I agree with the sentiment completely, but I also agree with Torminalis: some of your math is wonky. For instance, that the population of Luxembourg is 500,000 is not necessarily a meaningful comparison (it is, but it isn’t, for instance the population of Iceland is 272,500 and the population of New York is 8,000,000 and we’re just throwing out numbers) and 3 trillion is not one million times one million.
Since the Internet is full of nit pickers (present company included, obviously), you’ll drive your point home by making sure your numbers are tip top. Since so many have now chosen to ignore this awful war, accuracy or meaningful comparison becomes almost patriotic.
Good points! Our National security should be secondary to sending students to the University of England. I think it would be much better to have educated students living in fear of our trains being bombed, just like in Spain. Wait….maybe it is better to fight a terroristic war where the terrorists live instead of where we live? Ask Israel if it is fun to fight on your own soil…
Somebody has to protect your freedom and put an end to terrorism. So easy to judge a situation when you are sitting in the comfort of your home, while the real men of this country are protecting you everyday. War is expensive, but your freedom is priceless.
God Bless The USA and The Military Forces!
Go hug a tree you peace freaks!! Freedom will never be free!
We are a republic, and for those that want more, I yanked this from Wiki:
“A republic is a state or country that is not led by a hereditary monarch,[1][2] where the people of that state or country (or at least a part of that people)[3] have impact on its government,[4] and that is usually indicated as a republic.”…”An important reason why people could choose their society to be organized as a republic is the prospect of staying free of state religion: in this approach living under a monarch is seen as more easily inducing a uniform religion.”
My answer here is simply- vote. Tell people how you feel by casting your vote. Unfortunately I feel like we have a monarch running things right now. I’m tired of hearing how God will help us kill terrorist. 911 created the fury which unleashed the US on “terrorist”… I won’t live in fear, we are all going to die some day. It doesn’t mean I don’t think we need to police OUR nation, but I don’t like killing a bunch of people in their own sandbox over money (oil). War has been very profitable to some people- that’s why it’s so expensive.
A War is won through fighting, not withdrawals and excuses.
The war on Terror must be won, but the question is are we willing to pay the price for our security and our future?
Many of you do not know the full extend of the threat the US is facing when it comes down to Islamic jihadists and fundamentalists. so i urge you to WAKE UP!!
Read some good books like THE CAGED VIRGIN or KNOWING THE ENEMY and the many other great books out there.
All of the “we could have (fill in the blank) for the cost of 1 day in Iraq” comments miss an extremely important point. It’s not like we have that 3 billion lying around to use. We’re waging war on the Visa card; it’s all borrowed money. That’s why the dollar is tanking. When we went into Iraq the dollar was worth 1.25 euro and gasoline was under $2/gallon. Now the dollar is worth .67 euro, it’s lost half of its value. While everyone complains about the price of gasoline, it really hasn’t increased; it just that the dollars we use to buy it are worth half as much.
John - after we win the War on Terror, which emotion are we going after next?
Islamic Fundamentalists are no threat at all to those who do not threaten them. All of the acts of terrorism are blowback stemming from the imperial hubris of a bunch of countries that still think they matter.
My take on history is that no war has ever been won, by anyone. Over the long term, the costs always outweigh the benefits.
Excellent article.
wonderful! keep up the good work
excellent..enjoyed it if that is the right word to describe an appalling situation. And the guys that come home, knowing that they are taking part in an illegal war, just for oil and political power is very sad
Very well delivered, well done!
A message for Kyle:
“One last note: I am strongly against the use of misleading statistics. Without accurate, reliable data in front of me, I will not question the statement that 600,000 Iraqis have died.”
The American and British government did not use accurate, reliable data when they went looking for fabricated WMD’s.
Simple fact - The war was started on a lie. It cost Blair his job and Bush should be similarly forced to step down.
Simple Fact - President Bush is responsible for more deaths in Iraq than Saddam. You can work this out to be 0.02% of the population if you wish but within that inaccurately calculated number are women and children. Human beings, not terrorists. Just as the terrorsits themselves do, the current Allied forces are hitting out at the wrong people.
Now, if you’re a statistical person and keen on analysis. The cold hard figures of the cost of war are too high a price for any of us to pay (and I’m not talking about money). I’m pretty sure the US is doing ok moneywise out of Iraq what with overblown Security contracts, securing Middle Eastern oil fields and of course the actual expense of tanks, bombs and planes made my American companies.
It’s all very sad.
I appreciate the sentiment…just a shame that your maths is so screwed up.
Yes, it is sad to know that our military is dying over there, but seriously, a marine, sailor, soldier, airmen, is safer over in Iraq than on the streets in a car. There are much more deaths in America due to everyday things than there are in Iraq. And compared to history, this war has not been near as costly in lives as others have.
Myself and entire family serve in the military and I must admite that it is a sad thing to hear you basically say that we fight and die for no reason. It is something that we volunteered to do and take great pride in: protecting our nation and our brothers and sisters in arms. It is comforting to know that we, atleast, have eachother to die for and appreciate ours and our family’s sacrifices.
To repeat what someone has already posted …”Freedom isn’t Free.”
Has anyone bothered to figure out what the cost of not fighting this
war in Iraq and Afganistan might be? What would have been the cost
had we done nothing? Further, what good things have come out
of America taking a stand in the Middle East? Do the Iraquis have
any hope now when there was absolutely none under Sadaam and his
sons? I’d like to see these questions discussed?
Thought provoking article. Mind boggling - how our leaders can mislead us in a free world. It seems that the damage done by the ‘despots’ we are freeing the world from is puny compared to the mess now. The cost of not fighting these two wars would have been business as usual most probably.
Keep up the good work (I mean researching and writing this article)!
Whether we went to war for the right or wrong reasons, whether it’s ‘going well’ for us or not; we started something, so we have to finish it.
It’s completely wrong to bomb a country, overthrow their government (however corrupt it may be), set up a parliamentary democracy, and then just leave them in the grips of a civil war.
If the ‘allies’ have decided that democracy is right for the middle east regardless of their climate, then the powers should stay until they have achieved their goal.
You simply do not start a job that you don’t mean to finish. The boys in the UK forces know that they are fighting in some of the toughest modern warfare situations, and in the UK we need MORE money spent on this war - soldiers are dying of heatstroke, soldiers are going on patrol without any body armour. Despite all this, the attitude within all the British armed forces is one of commitment to making the world a better place.
you know if the United states government stopped starting wars and trying to “help” other countries the world might be a better place,now don’t get me wrong i am greatful that you help Australia during WWII i am glade that you came to our aid,but all of the “conflicts” that your government started since then have been horrible acts. now i hate to say it,but you brought 911 on your selves(by the way should be 119,day THEN month) your government fails to learn from its mistakes,which in turn makes you all look like idiots. if you hadn’t started the war you wouldn’t have these problems,you probably still have a firm death grip on the world and we all be bowing at your idiotic and religiously biased feet. but then again i am not American,so its not like your gonna even listen to me.
Thank you to PN for your comment, it is so true…
- An american Israeli
Amazing.
I agree 100% with this.
Good Day Anne,
You have put in words what I could not for fear of retribution. Well done for a Great Article.
President Bush came to power illegitimately, he misled the people of the US and the world.
He knows how to mislead people and how to lie.
1. Look at how he came to power!
2. Look at how he evaded serving in Viet Nam!
3. Look at his academic record.
4. Look at what he told us about weapons of mass destruction.
5. Look at the economy. He promised us this.
In my opinion President Bush is the biggest liar the World has known for a long time. Also, he is one who does not have a conscience. Humanity is paying the price for what President Bush promised us, “Kinder, Gentler, Conservative”.
Thank You. I am your fan.
Shergill.
Thanks once again for all the comments.
I just wanted to make one thing clear because there seems to be a slight misunderstanding. In the article, I said that the money spent on the war could have sent 43 million students to University in England. I did not mean Americans coming to England to a University, I meant UK students studying in England.
To number 25 (Sam), I appreciate that you are not the only one holding the view that the essential pillars of humanity like freedom should come at the price of invaluable human lives. It is the same mentality which virtually dismisses the equality of humankind which was responsible for 1. Slaughtering, raping and stealing from the Native Americans. 2. Destroying, violating, and pilfering from the Aboriginals. And 3. Murdering, burning and castrating the Jews. I could go on here but I’ll leave you with this.
A great, thought provoking article - thank you for writing this!
my husband went to war ova in the sand box as he calls it i have not hear from him in so long look around all this war has done is made petrol and food and every thing so much people can not afford feed their children or to live i think it big waste of money when so much more can be done with the money Mr Bush is as we say here a knob head its so sad see all that his done and gets away with it ..i miss my other half and feel for all the families that have love ones and friends over the sand box ..when will it end ?????????????
I find it interesting that people call President Bush a “liar” and say that he “fabricated” evidence to support going to war. The people who spout this at their peace, love, hug everyone while dancing on your rainbow rallies are the very same people who applauded Clinton for bombing empty asprin factories in Iraq based on THE EXACT SAME INTELLIGENCE. The utter hypocrisy of liberals never fails to astound me.
I have been touched personally by this war. My husband left to fight it for two years. He left the week after our wedding. I spent the first two years of my marriage alone, my husband in a war zone. I know the cost. We lost friends and loved ones to the cause. However, I am still in support of the mission. I was from the beginning, and I will be until the end.
It’s so sad to me that people are falling all over themselves to abandon ship, cut and run, leaving the Iraqi people to fend for themselves against the insurgency, and condemning yet another generation of young men, the sons of those fighting today, to go back and finish the job.
Nobody said it was going to be easy. Or fun. Or cute and rosy. The simple fact of the matter is that terrorists will not be appeased. They are not interested in peace. They are not interested in cease fire. They are interested only in the eradication of “western infadels”. They will not rest until the achieve their ends or are destroyed.
I am not interested in wearing a burkha anytime soon, so I suggest we finish the job. Eliminate the terrorists, the extreme militant Islamists, and give the Iraqi people a chance at freedom while keeping our own shores protected.
What terrorists are left are already scared. We went in, and we made more terrorists than we were originally supposed to fight, and destroyed terrorists and civilians alike. Sudam is dead. Iraqis are not mentally defficient. Everyone is saying “we need to establish a stable government for them.” They aren’t babies, leave them with their country. Its not the United States of Iraq, we were just there to take out a genocidal leadership. Right handed Republicans are so quick to join the “security” bandwagon. Simple statements that instill fear make you react aggressively. Our old Nazi friends were the same way with non Aryan races. Why should we do the same thing with anyone that owns oil?It is rash, and we never question the information we are given, we just take it as true. Read, find sources, don’t take information as true just because Fox news said it. We are fighting terror, terror is intangible, we won’t win, we can’t against something that doesnt physically exist. Get over yourselves, get our troops back, and lets rebuild our damages and regain our right to be the most prominent country in the world. Its not like we aren’t free, other countries have seen what happens when someone messes with our freedom.
I am not from USA, but am grateful that a country like the USA engenders so much hope in investors throughout the world, that they entrust the USA and its military to spread freedom in those places where it is not, all on a credit card. The cost is staggering, to be sure. But, we live in a century likely to see the end of state-on-state war. Europe, Russia, India, China, and North America have achieved or are on the path towards becoming free societies that are becoming part of a global community living in peace with each other despite having waged war amongst ourselves during most of our past. But what is a free society in a global community? It is one where each individual person has the freedom to match their own ability and ambition to choose the course of their individual life and leaders to follow. Unfortunately, there are places in S. America, Africa, and Asia where despots with armed followers deny this to their own countrymen for their own enrichment. But we live in a time of unprecedented hope. These places of oppression are shrinking in number. One way they disappear is after extremely expensive armed intervention removes “bad players” and creates an environment where formerly oppressed people, information, goods, services, and money can flow within the country and external to the country as part of the global community in a market system that is evolving to becoming more and more fair. It is the non-military flows (particularly investment capital) into former “unsafe places to invest” that drives this progress. To present a more balanced view, it would be instructive to compare these flows in monetary terms within/to/from an Iraq before and after the military and stabilization interventions to see if there has been a net return on investment. All these numbers are staggeringly huge, but would permit a more educated discourse on the value of vast amount of life and treasure being spent in pursuit of spreading freedom to those who could otherwise only pray that somehow it comes.
Democrats. Every one of you who agree to this article. And where would we be if Gore was in office?
REALCOST OF IRAQ WAR ISNT THIS MONEY
THE REAL COST IS THOSE HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF PEOPLE WHO DIED..
What I do not understand is this….
-The US budget is just over $2.5 trillion per year.
-The ENTIRETY of military spending is about 4% of the budget each year.
-This puts ALL military spending each year at $120 billion (or $0.12 trillion for visual ease).
-To date, since the Iraq war in 2003 ALL military spending has come to $0.60 trillion, five times less than the estimate in this article. Additionally, this figure includes the cost we would be paying for a standing military as well as the often glossed over Afghanistan war.
I actually first came across these figures while reading “test” written by Rev. Wright (if you don’t know to whom I refer then run it in a search). His figures are correct and backed up by other sources I have checked. One such source is the CIA World Factbook. While this is still a considerable amount of money spent on the military this nation spends more on freebies to senior citizens or about as much on welfare.
I do not see how we can have clean drinking water for the entire world or feed the entire world with this amount of money since we cannot provide for the American poor for more money.
In sum, am not getting into the moral dilemmas that the Iraq war has presented. Though the fact that I would even question this “article” probably belies my own opinion. Honestly though, I would really like to see from where these figures came.
——-
Somewhere on the internet….someone is wrong.
I went back and read some of the other posts. Half the reason was because I wanted to make sure I wasn’t repeating anything. The other half is, well, I can’t sleep…too much coffee today.
So yeah, I couldn’t get through all the posts because I can only stand to read “I agree with this 100%” so many times. On a similar note, I was under the impression that the 1960’s were, in part, about questioning everything and especially authority. Somehow political discourse on the left adopted this message and bastardized it in a way where people fall in line mindlessly yet believe they are outspoken. No one questions anything they are told unless it is said by a someone who leans toward the political right. Even then it seems that every one of their statements is inherently untrustworthy.
We have become a nation of lemmings and I am sad. =(
———
Global Warming is BS too. Discuss amongst yourselves. =)
I’m not a supporter of mister Bush or any of the allied forces,but what they did was right. The dark side of war is the only thing that marred its campaign. Just remember 9/11,and other atrocities committed by the terrorists. I hope that you are not one of the victims. You forgot to mention that we,as an individual person has his/her own will to do things that creates evil,wickedness,and sin. Now multiply that to the entire population of the earth,and you will see the results. You sound more of a politician,rather than a peace advocate. Mister Bush is not a God,so be sure to expect that he can commit mistakes. Of course,he will be liable if he will be found guilty of committing crimes. About lives being lost,it cannot be avoided. Spending money during war is absolutely necessary. Ever wonder why you can express yourself freely? Ever wonder why you can walk,talk and spend your hours in any thing you want to do? The answer is freedom. And the reason behind that freedom are the brave American soldiers fighting for you,your families,relatives and the American people as a whole,to preserve liberty. I’m not saying that you have to salute them,but you can sob or shed a tear and say,”thank you”.In this world of evil and wickedness,we cannot guarantee peace and equality,but we can be free.
Great Article Anne!. It shows how the rash actions of a few can affect the lives of many adversely.
According to the book Catch Me If You Can by Emelua Azuka, the actions of Bush are underlined by an often overlooked, accepted and popular ideology of power.
It’s clear that many people do not read the article before jumping to conclusions. What does this article say exactly? As a whole it lays out data and comparisons for the reader to largely make up his/own mind about this particular topic.
It is beyond my comprehension how, from reading the article, (not just the comments that accompany it) that it could be determined whether or not the writer is a democrat, a politican, a peace activist etc. (Not that I mind particularly being called any of these things).
Thanks for all the feedback and comments. It is good to know that opinions are expressed from both sides of the coin!
Anne Lyken-Garner-
I agree that no one could know your exact political position. Honestly, I don’t care.
What I do care about is the fact that your numbers are wrong. This article is a poorly conceived pile of junk and you can’t even address what I said in post #53.
I looked at the table of the NY Times money breakdown. Now, it is funny that they put the entire cost of all military expenditures at $0.200 trillion annually. But if you read the fine print that includes future medical services and money paid to Veterans even after they retire. It is not representative of the cost of the Iraqi war or our current spending in anyway. It only serves to back up my numbers, i.e. that only $0.120 trillion is spent on all of military each year. Your numbers on the other hand are proven wrong by your own source.
If memory serves the actual cost of the Iraq war itself is about $0.040 trillion each year, a considerable sum. But this sum is 0.5% of the US yearly budget. The actual total cost of the Iraq war so far is roughly $0.200 trillion dollars. You are way off in the cost of the war.
Also, stacking dollar bills around the moon as a way demonstrating how much money involved is meaningless because it doesn’t give any real world perspective for the numbers. When dealing with huge sums why not put it in reasonable terms, like percentage of the budget. Here the cost of the Iraq War is 0.5% of what Americans pay in taxes EACH YEAR. Less than one percent of our taxes goes to fighting this war.
This country hemorages cash trying to fix problems by coddling businesses and individuals. Money that could be better spent, I dunno, defending the nation from terrorists….
Hell, maybe people who pay taxes should just be allowed to keep their money instead of wasting it on social programs that haven’t noticiably helped.
———-
You can’t reason someone out of a position that they weren’t reasoned into to begin with.
P.S. Ms. Lyken-Garner - I ask you again, where did 3 trillion come from?
Note, I made a mistake. Military spending is 4% of the US GDP not the budget. All military spending is 20% of the yearly US budget. So I can see from where the $3 trillion figure came even though it is still wrong.
The short and the long of all this is that more than one percent of our taxes is going to the Iraq war. Considering that we are also fighting a war in Afghanistan and have to pay for military bases around the world and all the personel not serving in Iraq I would feel comfortable saying that less than 10% US taxes is going to the Iraq war. Still, the largest part of the US budget is spent on services to senior citizens.
——
More to come, though I doubt anyone cares
I’ve worked on my sources for over 10 minutes and have just lost them while trying to post the comment. I will get back to you
It happened again.
here are just 4 very quickly, excuse mistakes,can’t read over.
1. A noble peace prize winner calculated it
The guardian newspaper
2. msnbc news
3. The democratic party website
4.National priorities website.
I think that putting links here is causing my comments to disappear when I click on ‘post comment’I've been at this for 45minutes now,trying to put up the links here
here are some quotes instead
(from number 1)
“Appetites whetted, Stiglitz and Bilmes dug deeper, and what they have discovered, after months of chasing often deliberately obscured accounts, is that in fact Bush’s Iraqi adventure will cost America - just America - a conservatively estimated $3 trillion”
(from number 2)
Amherst-Mass.-based group that tracks the impact of federal spending on local communities. Using a “top-down” calculation based on U.S. budget appropriations, the group estimates the total money spent or allocated comes to about $255 million per day, or a little less than $1.8 billion a week. That figure includes both military and non-military spending on things like reconstruction.
Joe, Sorry about the mess. The links are surely not working. Type in the 4 headings in the above comment and their sites will come up. I am sure that there are lots of people who care about your opinion expressed here, and indeed agree with them.
On writing this article I knew that there would be many people on both sides of the coin.
With regards to your comment about ‘the moon’ example I gave in my article. I used this ‘visual’ because this piece is not a dry political commentary, so adding ‘colour’ to it with expressive and illustrative writing was the right thing to do.
You will find some very eye-opening statements about the war in number 3. All the sources are listed. I tried to copy and paste some of them here for you, but this also, didn’t work.
Number 4 allows you to calculate how much a particular city or state has spent so far, and the money climbs right before your eyes. I am sure you’ll find very interesting facts on these web-sites.
Keep in mind that I am not American, nor do I live there. Therefore my content in this article expresses overall statements about not just America, a fact that a lot of commentators here seem to force themselves to overlook.
Thank you for your involvement and most intelligent comments.
Best,
Anne
I’ve had the same problem posting.
Anyways, I’m actually very interested in these estimates that you have posted. Thanks for posting the source material.
The last picture is actually of American soldiers detonating a seized IED safely, not more of our troops dying. Besides, our troops have enlisted on their own pride to defend our country, and we should support them no matter what your opinion may be. The terrorists our soldiers target are bent our destruction, of the destruction of the entire western world. These people’s religion is supposedly a religion of peace, yet they are to blame for the deaths of our soldiers. Sharia Law states that killing innocent Americans will send you to heaven, making this “religion of peace” a killing machine. By attacking these extremists, we have freed an entire nation from a fascist ruler, and made its people free again. Unfortunately, the liberal media seems to have skipped over this topic too many times.
This absolutely breaks my heart.
Lol, You are just one of millions of anti-war people, who can’t recognize the true meaning of war. It’s articles like these that show how ignorant some people in America can get.
impeachbush dot org
maybe we shouldn’t have gone to war with the Germans, we lost hundreds of thousands of men in that, maybe the Americans should never have gone to war in the civil war against the south, they lost hundreds of thousands in that, maybe we should never stick up for what is right because it costs too much, maybe a future like that is for you but I consider the sacrifice worth the future of mankind a far greater future than that of none action, consider for a few moments what the world would be like if none action was taken for the first few things I had mentioned
The two World Wars were fought to stop an aggressive, invasive enemy bent on taking over all or most of Europe (and the second one - the world if possible).
The Civil War was caused by the Southern States attacking the North so “not fighting” that war would have been tantamount to just surrendering the North without fighting - though the Southern generals of the time were determined to attack in any case regardless.
However, Iraq was not attacking anyone. It had no WMD production. It had no nuclear, chemical OR biological weapons being produced. Its missile capability was risable, as was its air force and navy. It had a large, but extremely ill-prepared army. They had no contact with Al Qayeda - referring to them at one point as “lunatics”.
They were no danger to anyone but Israel - though Israel seemed more than capable of dealing with Iraq’s former leader.
Bush linked Iraq with Al Qayeda - spuriously, and knowingly so. Bush - having funded and sold equipment to Saddam - was competently aware there were not links to any terrorists and Iraq. Iraq was a completely secular society - if a dictatorship. But bear in mind, so is Iran, and so was the USSR not so long ago, and almost every other Middle Eastern nation is a religious monarchy, run on Sharia law. This include Saudi Arabia - the largest REAL funder of Al Quayeda.
Iraq WAS secular, but now Sunni and Shi’ite sects threaten to rip the country apart - and the Shi’ites are starting to gain ground. And the Shi’ite radicals ARE funders and sympathisers with Al Quayeda… like Iraq is.
The US has basically made Iraq a far more dangerous and unstable place than it used to be… dangerous to the REST of the world that is!
AmericanBOb, I couldn’t express it better than you did. I’ve read surprising comments about Saddam not allowing women to go to school etc and wondered how people in today’s societies could be so clueless about the world around them. I am really surprised (though maybe I shouldn’t have been) that in an age where we no longer have to go out of our way to get information, some still do not know that Iraq, before the war, was a secular country.
As you rightly said, the American government would never have put Saddam into power were he a muslim radical.
Number 68’s comment made me sigh, as again, you’ve pointed out that those wars cannot in all common sense be linked with, or compared to, however loosely, to the Iraq war.
“maybe we should never stick up for what is right” (68’s comment)does this mean I wonder, invading another country and killing their people, then say that we should continue to ravage their lives to establish a government, because they are too stupid and uncivilised to do it themselves. What utter nonsense.
Saddam was not a good man by any standards, but he is now gone from the Iraqi people’s lives. Why haven’t the soldiers?
that is one scary mural =/ i think the examples of what could have been done with the money instead of the war, especialy the world poverty example
The war in Iraq has sent U.S. relations with other countries 20 years backwards, not to mention your economy.
And freedom isn’t free, it’s priceless. You can’t buy it, and you can’t force it upon others.
The sad thing here above and beyond the casualties and waste of money, is how you war supporters have SETTLED for the “Saddam was a bad man” line of BS.
This rationale (if you can even call it that) seems to be a desperate last defense in justifying the war. It’s a half-assed admission that everything Bush initially said was either A) Wrong or B) A Lie; but that all doesn’t matter anyway. Why? Because Saddam was a bad man.
You try to conjure up images of a ravenous half-man half-demon running around gassing everyone in his country and forcing women into servitude.
My challenge: Sufficiently explain to ANYONE with HALF A BRAIN why Saddam Hussein was sufficiently “bad,” in comparison to ANY of the other present dictators/dictatorships. Bad enough to JUSTIFY the deaths of our sons and daughters.
I might just offer a cash prize. stay tuned.
And the cost of war has kept you alive with the freedoms to write this article. Have some respect for your soldiers that are fighting. You are kicking back writing an article opposing what they are fighting for. Were you given the same intelligence information as the president? NO. Were you in his position? NO. WMD’s were found in Iraq by the way. Mounds of bodies of Shiites were found to. Did our media play it? NO. Do some REAL research.
It is my humble opinion that the Iraq war is completely unnecessary. It was begun on the premise that Saddam Hussein was stockpiling WMD’s. Tghese were never found because they don’t exist. If they did exist at that time Hussein woiuld hvae happily and gleefully nuked Israel!
So what are we fighting for in Iraq? Oil? Power? or are we just hesitant to admit the futility and back out gracefully. Look back at the Afghanistan war with the Russians. If you have forgotten, the Russians basically lost that war.
All the pictures you see of children hugging US soldiers and battalions being cheered as they enter certain places is nothing but political propaganda. It is utterly, entirely and completely meaningless.
Are we any further from a nother 9/11 than we were a few years ago. No, we are not.
If Al Qaida wants to strike on US soil, they will. That is a sad fact that we must live with. The real truth is that no country on the face of the planet is safe from terrorism.
It is a terrible thing indeed that Americans are dying at the rate they are in this useless, sorry excuse for a “war”.
It angers me that we are spending this type of money on a senseless war when President Bush is in the process of passing a bill that eliminates a huge chunk of funding from public school special education programs.
Where are his priorities?
The writer of this article has it right. The cash blown on the Iraq war could do a whole lot of good elsewhere here in the good old USA.
Perhaps it is time for a citizen’s revolt? Worked last time…
I find it inconceivable that President Bush seems to believe that peace and democracy in the Middle East is possible. If he has read the whole Bible, he should know that there has been war there since Cain killed Abel, and it will only end with Armaggedon.
usa (aka) roman empire Same demise …………..
The Money - The Lives - The Oil - Now (5 years and 1 month and 11 days) later.Does it all make sense can we all agree that the Big Picture - the outcome that now should be so clear with well thought out plans - is emerging.
The strategy to clear Iraq of terrorists - can we all see that the families from both sides of this War are going to come together as friends after this …..
The Big Picture how do you mend this now ….. I have already seen footage of people going back to fight for there dead friends.
Its moved beyond reason - its not to remove Saddam he\’s dead, Al Qaeda and Bin Laden has never truely been found.
So now its revenge - for people that have died on both sides.
My worry is - what will happen if nobody allows the soldiers to get home to there families ….. 5 years is not a holiday …. its residence …… I would like to know how and when they are going to be able to return safely.
or is this not the Big Picture ……..
(USA,Israel,Iraq) (China,Russia,Iran)
My own view is that if America continues spending at this rate and letting its soldiers get killed - the plan - waiting for ? USA to run out of money and cause big problems in the USA - try to own the Oil fields or try to make a play for Iran ? so that they can use money from the Oil Fields to pay for the Army.
An option still exists to slowly remove the army ……. I really do not like the thought of any other options …….
I’m sorry for every single life and the families left behind but I went to high school and grew up with men who were in the vietnam war and my dad was in world war two….their lives were no less important or less valuable then those involved in Iraq and their families have suffered just as great.May I ask where were you and all those who lost loved ones in every single war that has ever been fought,and may I ask who are those you blame for all these wars and what could you or I have done to stop them? When you are able to answer all these questions truthfully,then it may mean something of tremendous value to all those involved.Until then,please do not insult the rest of those who have suffered untold loss.
You can vote for a new leader with the view to ending this …… no more people need to die ……
Snowbird #84. I’m sorry I really don’t understand your question or comment. However, I’ll say that my grandfather fought in the war against Germany. He may or may not have killed people, I do not know. What I’m sure of though, is that one CANNOT draw parallel lines between WW1 and 2 to this Iraq war. They are just not the same. One very different fact is that in those days the country occupying the lands of others was deemed the perpetrator.
I am very, very sad by all the lives being lost and the families who have to suffer because they’ll never see their loved ones again. This is why all this is so sad. At the end of the day, money can always be earned again, oil is bought and sold, dictators are soon discovered for who they are, but lives lost cannot be recovered. If you think that I do not value lives, you’ve sadly missed the point.
” . . .Islamic Fundamentalists are no threat at all to those who do not threaten them.”
Quite possibly the wrongest I’ve ever heard someone be. Do you know ANYTHING about the history of Islam? And don’t give me any Spanish Inquisition BS–that was 600 years ago.
I agree with the article for the most part, but the fact that your title has the word “cost” in it really hurts your valliant effort. Still, it’s an error we should all learn from because while you might of made an error in your figures, many in our country are making the mistake of backing the war effort. I look forward to reading more of your work.
Who cares what it costs? It’s necessary to our future as a nation! Our existance and way of life is dependent on our ability to remain the most powerful nation in the world. The more power we have, the more shots people will take at us. POWER is fundamental to human nature and will always cause conflict among people. YOU have to decide whether you want to be at the top or at the bottom of that CONSTANT struggle.
Excellent article. It elicits people’s emotions because in one way or the other they are involved. Congrats.
Dear Wade in Tejas,
I have read both your comments. Your comment “Who cares what it costs” is insensitive to both the author of this article and it’s readers. Look at the number of views experessed against the war. Then you go on to make a statement like “who cares what it costs”. All these people who have written and a majority of the world cares about what it costs. It seems that you have chosen not to see, read, hear, or care about what others say but push on with your own agenda. “Who cares what it costs” is perhaps a reflection of your inner thoughts!
It comes across as if you cannot read what is written or that you do not want to listen to the other views.
In your opinion anyone who opposes American policies is “pro-terrorism”. A vast majority of people will agree that there were no weapons of mass destruction and that President Bush and Prime Minister T. Blair lied to the world. None of the masses of “Taliban” or “Insurgents” have been judged to be Taliban or Insurgents. They are first killed and then labelled as Taliban or Insurgents.
The world also knows that Mr. Bush manipulated the system so that he will not have to serve in Vietnam.
Last but not least Mr. Bush was appointed by the legal system to be the president of the U.S. - by a judge who was appointed by his father. We the ordinary people care about what is going on and we know that the system is prejudice againt the poor but in favour of the rich. Tibet was run over by China and noone said anything. Kuwait was runover by Saddam Hussein, America was quick to defend “democracy” even when none existed.
The war in the Middle East is being fought to maintain “Israel” as a dominant power in the Middle East.
I heard this somewhere…
A Conspiracy Theory about the Iraq War: It was said that Bush continues to battle Iraq (even though the purpose has long been served) because they want to get hold of the oil Iraq is so rich of.
Correct me if I’m wrong.
That was awsome, keep up the wicked writing man.
what do u expect from the king of the terriost
[URL=http://mzfyjutd.com]uxpccoyn[/URL] ganttwxb kfsgmcfu http://odqmfgdo.com ltseacrk ggdzdszs
hey #26, Win the war on terror? Kinda like how we won the war on drugs? lol, idiot.
Good day!
It is very informative and has a very good quality in it.
I like it…
http://www.Squidoo.com/MPI
mliragana.blogspot.com
Thank you very much for your time.
I really hate war. This is just a business and nonsense.
Well war is a last resort. Bush did what he had to do based on the information at hand.So i am curious to see what you (left) moon bats,have to cry about now that he is out of office. PS: It is not the governments (TAXPAYERS) job to “What could this money be spent on instead of the war
* $3 trillion would provide clean drinking water for every last individual who needs it
* Totally eradicate world poverty
* Buy gas for every driver in the US for 10 years
* Educate, house and feed every last Aids orphaned child in Africa for 10 years
* Provide Primary education for every child on earth
* Provide free medical care for 16 million Americans (money spent on the war each day)
* Send 43 million students to University in England ” Lets see the yes we can crowd do better…….