White House Insider: Clintons, Scandals, and the Birth Certificate..
Published by Ulsterman on November 9, 2010 in World Politics-
32
Liked it 
Subscribe to RSS
Part two of our latest White House Insider series.
Do you mind if we switch gears just a bit? With the short time we have left I want to throw a bunch of questions at you. Is that ok? Sure – fire away kid. No promise I’ll give you an answer though.
Ok – so you still think Hillary Clinton is thinking of running for President in 2012? Yes.
What will be the biggest factor in her final decision? The economy. If it does not improve she is in. She will run.
How long before that decision is made by her? By spring – a few more months or so. But she won’t be the first to jump in against Obama. Word is there will be a break the ice candidate.
Break the ice candidate? What is that? Someone will step in to challenge Obama – break the ice. That will allow Hillary to come in after and not be the party crasher so to speak. The first candidate comes in and creates the chaos – she follows after to calm it all down and play up her experience. She is saving the party and saving the country. If Hillary gets into the race for president, some version of that process is how it will go down.
You know this? How? There is no real “know” in politics. Things are changing – but Hillary wants in. She wants to be president. So, now they just have to wait and plan for the right opportunity. That opportunity may come, and it may not. They are looking at deciding by spring though, that much I do know. For instance, if the scandal breaks – that would give her a prime opportunity to step in now wouldn’t it?
Yes, I guess it would. If Hillary Clinton were to seek the presidency, would you support her? Absolutely – I have said that to you already. Yes, I would absolutely support her. And I would gladly be a part of her campaign. Hey Hillary – call me! (laughs)
How about the new Republican Congress? Do you think they will get those Bush tax cuts extended? Probably. The Democrats are trying to exclude the top bracket cuts. Make the issue about the Republicans wanting to protect the rich. That’s from a very old playbook, right? The Republicans are aware of that trap, and will work to give a blanket extension for all tax payers. In the end you will see the lower brackets given the permanent extension and the upper brackets given a temporary extension – say two years.
Why two years? Because that will work in the Democrats’ favor for 2012. They will be able to once again say how the Republicans want to give tax cuts to the rich. It’s a simple trap – but the Republicans are stupid enough to fall for it. Just watch. 50/50 they actually fall for it. Boehner…he’s not all that bright you know.
Even with Democrats like yourself being so open about it? The “trap” that is? Sure. This little blog of yours won’t make one difference on that. The media is already trying to set it up for Democrats. The messaging is already initiated. Look for the Republicans to make the same mistake the Democrats did after 2008 – thinking the American people are on their side. No – the American people despise both parties. Well, now that Republicans won back the House in 2010, they can once again be painted as the party for the rich, for the bankers, for big business, etc. With a Republican Speaker, it will make that task much easier for us. Losing the House has made me far more hopeful that Democrats can do well – or at least much better, in 2012. There will be a lot of bumps along the way, but our chances have greatly improved.
You sound a lot more positive than you were before. What happened to all the crisis in the Democratic Party talk? Oh, the party is still in crisis, and there is going to be much more to come…what’s that saying? First comes denial, then anger, and finally acceptance. Maybe I’m at the acceptance stage now. People in the party are talking, things are forming, I see a new and stronger direction for 2012 and beyond. Unless of course, Nancy Pelosi somehow manages to keep her leadership role within the party. That would be…incredibly stupid of us. But you never know what Democrats are capable of right? If Pelosi retains her position, there will be more staff leaving the White House because that will signal the party has truly lost its political compass and the White House will have been proven powerless in correcting it. Nobody wants to work for a loser. The poor bastards who were around for Carter – it took them years to recover their careers, and some never really did.
How likely is it she keeps her role as Democrat leader in the House? She is out. I just cannot see it happening – her being allowed to be minority leader. No way. Yeah, it could happen – it’s possible, but very unlikely. And if it does happen…well, you can throw all of my hope for 2012 out the window. Pelosi is too mixed up in what is coming at us in the coming months.
The White House scandal? Yes, that, and the ethics investigations of Rangel and Waters, and likely some others. The Republicans will drag those out for optimal impact. We know that – we’ve accepted that. Having Pelosi out in front as the face of the party during this time would be a horrible decision.
Specifically on the White House scandal again – I was told a report was coming soon. Something from a mainstream media outlet. Have you heard something similar? Where did you hear that? Your newspaper days coming back to you now?
Just something I heard – reliably. Have you heard anything similar? (pause) Yes. Many people have. This thing is percolating just under the surface right now. Sooner – not later, the pot is gonna start boiling. Yeah, someone is about to test the waters with this thing. I’ve heard that. Then again, I’ve heard that for a while now, so who knows, huh? I’d watch yourself though – told you that before. Be very careful who you are talking to on this. These people don’t play nice.
But nothing more specific? A name? No-no-no. Not going there – not yet. I don’t have the protection. Read the Times. Somebody there has sniffed it out. And a guy over at the Post. If the Post starts to get on it, the Times will probably go ahead and break it open, loyalty to the White House be damned. I told you before, parts of the story have already been given out publicly here and there. One part will lead to another and then another. It’s underway right now. Every week a little bit more shows itself.
You really like this cloak and dagger stuff don’t you? (laughs) Yeah, I suppose I do. But I also take it seriously, and you should too. Your blog thing is reaching the eyes and ears of some people very high up, and it’s driving them absolutely nuts.
Ok, I gotta ask this. And I don’t mean any disrespect to you but so many of my readers bring this up and some of them make pretty credible arguments on the subject that I’ve wanted to ask you about it for awhile…(leans forward) You got my attention – what’s the question?
The birth certificate issue…is it…is there some validity to… (eyebrows raise up) You’re going to ask me a Birther question! (laughs) I’m not laughing at the question, I’m laughing at how uncomfortable you are in trying to ask it!
Well, it does seem to go right into full on conspiracy stuff which I don’t like to pay much attention to. Hey, almost every great government scandal began as a silly conspiracy right? It’s how one side effectively discredits the other – just call them crazy. I have done it many times. Not so much because I enjoy it but because it works.
So…any truth to the birth certificate thing? Hell if I know – and I’m not sure I want to know. Do you realize the mess that would create if it was true? There would be violence of the kind this country has not seen in our lifetimes – or at least your lifetime. I forget sometimes how old I really am.
C’mon, you’re dancing around it. Is there any credibility to it? (leans back, folds arms across chest) Look, I will say this- people seem to have spent a considerable amount of time and money keeping others from finding out. I don’t know why more than to say this president has been very protective of almost everything in his past. From college transcripts to medical records to writings…he’s clearly very concerned with his privacy. I don’t necessarily fault him for that, but it does make you wonder – I understand that. If you are asking me if Obama is an American I say yes. I have no doubt about that. If you are asking me if Obama was born in America…
That’s exactly what I am asking you. Yeah…that one is a little tougher to say. I sure as hell hope so, because if he wasn’t, and somebody is able to prove it – holy hell we got problems.
You really think President Obama might not have been born in America? Whoa – don’t take it that far, ok? I’m not comfortable with you putting it quite like that. It’s not so much I don’t think he was born in America, it’s more that I am open to the possibility of that. Or I’m at least sympathetic to people who wonder about it themselves. But I don’t want to go there – it’s irrelevant to me. It’s too dangerous to consider. And it’s Obama’s own fault. He has covered up his past. Beyond his books, which frankly from what I have seen of him firsthand I don’t think he wrote entirely himself, there really is very little we know about the guy. The one most responsible for all of these conspiracy stories is Barack Obama. When you have White House staff – people who were involved in the day to day decisions coming out of the West Wing saying they have no clue who Obama really is, that shows an environment that is going to create a lot of this conspiracy stuff surrounding the president. And how about I ask you what you believe? Do you think Obama wasn’t born in America?
I’m not sure. I used to ignore that talk. Now I’m not sure. Like you said, there has been so much cover up of his past. Why? And you seem to have the same kind of doubts I do. Hmmm…I wouldn’t go quite that far. I think you want to believe in that Birther stuff. I don’t. I hope to God it’s not true. You on the other hand…
Now you’re putting words in my mouth. I don’t want it to be true either, I am just starting to wonder if…well, it appears there is smoke and maybe there’s fire. Fair enough. I can understand that.
So I take it this White House scandal you’ve been talking about has nothing to do with the birth certificate issue? No – not to my knowledge, no. Good lord, no. Don’t tie me up to that subject matter! And we gotta wrap this one up, ok?
Nervous? No – just in a hurry. We can pick this up again when I have more to tell you.
One last question. Make it quick please.
Who is the next to leave the White House? You correctly predicted Summers and Emanuel before anyone else. Can you give me another prediction on who the next administration figure who is on the way out? Sure – but there is going to be a whole rash of departures coming up you know. Top to bottom.
Can you give me a big name – somebody important who is leaving? You testing me?
Maybe – just seeing if you are still getting good information. Oh – I see. I’m only as good as my last success, is that it?
Sure – something like that. Gibbs.
Gibbs? Yeah – the fat -expletive- Gibbs is gone. And good riddance.
REFERENCE: WHITE HOUSE INSIDER: “TEMPORARY INSANITY”
http://newsflavor.com/politics/world-politics/white-house-insider-temporary-insanity/
ULSTERMAN REPORT: WHITE HOUSE INSIDER REVIEW
http://newsflavor.com/politics/world-politics/the-ulsterman-report-white-house-insider-review/
TD just left this comment on her post:
“Oh, brother, I can’t believe Ulsterman messed up the question to Insider about the birth certificate….
…The question is not where Obama was born. It’s what his long-form birth certificate says. Does it say his name is Barry Soetoro because Barack Obama’s original Hawaii birth certificate was sealed when he was adopted by Soetoro? This would indicate dual Indonesian citizenship….”
http://texasdarlin.wordpress.com/2010/11/09/question-for-ulsterman-at-newsflavor-from-a-skeptical-reader/#comment-113807
Fascinating interview! This was one of the best so far. Anyone else think this insider about crapped their pants over the birth certifcate questions? If there really is an issue with Obamas citizenship that would burn the entire democrat party and the media etc. This insider is protecting his own. He or she knows something. That is what I got from this. Keep at it ulsterman. Learn more about Obamas citizenship status and keep asking about it. Dont be duped by the deniars!!!!!
This is the most honest politician i’ve ever seen. Although i wonder if he too burns (sacrifices) babies and worships the devil at that BOHEMIAN GROVE secret meeting place they (all word leaders be it politicians, religious etc.) meet at.
Well, Gibbs is kind of a “gimme”. If everyone says the problem is “messaging”, I can hardly see how they can keep the main point guy on messaging in his current job.
Love the dancing around the birth certificate. All of the proof I need is that not one MSM outlet has done a thorough, complete piece on it . . . ever. Even just to debunk it. Not one.
As I look into the bowl of alphbet soup it says Rand Paul .Vs .Hillary Klinton.
The scandal is not the birth certificate issue because the Insider said in part one that the White House is in the process of trying to insulate Obama from whatever it is. Kinda difficult to do when it involves his own citizenship status don’t you think? It has to be something in Chicago. In one of the prior threads someone linked to an article about Obama getting kickbacks from Rezko. That would make sense given the Insider said the scandal was big enough to bring down the the presidency and threatens everyone in the party. Having Obama linked to such illegal shenanigans could do just that. IRS the one story that’s always been there and there could always be new info hit at any moment.
Jaydee is right on IMHO. The big scandal is Chicago. Rezko, Blago, Jarret they are all mixed in it. Bribes, maybe worse. I think we are slowly being pointed in that direction. Or more likely the media people reading this stuff are being pointed there. And I do think they are reading this stuff. Hell yes they are.
Maybe Russ Feingold is the break the ice candidate? He did say on to 2012 as he walked away….
Nice write dear ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
– “Do you think Obama wasn’t born in America? — I’m not sure. I used to ignore that talk. Now I’m not sure. Like you said, there has been so much cover up of his past. Why? –”
Why indeed! Obama’s entire past is a long, shameful trail of intentional prevarications, starting with his birth place, which was not in Hawaii as he claims, but in Kenya. Check out the high resolution copy of Obamas August 4, 1961 birth certificate from the Coast Province General Hospital, Mombasa, Kenya. It is available for free download from WasObamaBornInKenya.com
I was in Chicago when Obama made his meteoric rise from one of a couple of dozen candidates for US Senate to THE candidate. Something about that smelled, as the candidates in front of him fell one by one. Someone engineered all this, whoever and what they did will tie to Rezko, Blago, payoffs.
Besides the birth cert, there’s the ss# that he uses that was issued in ct, there’s the fact that he ‘voluntarily surrendered’ his law license during his presidential campaign after someone accused him of fraud…..
and the list goes on and on.
The very fact that all of this is ‘untouchable’ is the surest sign i know of that this country is toast. If the rule of law is so flagrantly violated, one has to be an idiot to think everything is going to “be ok”.
Next question for the source-
Would Obama intentionally start a war with China or create a huge international incident in order to get people to forget or ignore the criminal issues that the insider says are coming. Is he capable of destroying this country to save his tail?
My theory is that he never really graduated from college and was just given the paper. Someone\’s got the goods to prove it. You can\’t keep that many people quiet.
The issue of the non-renewal and surrender of the law license came about as someone accessed his original bar application. It was found that he answered “NO” to using any other name than Barack Hussein Obama and answered “NO” on any felony or misdemeanor when it was found out he had 17 outstanding tickets which he did not pay.
If he surrendered his license, than the Bar would not proceed in filing charges.
Moochelle surrendered hers because of a complaint filed against her was what was discovered. After only 3 years of having such license. So, I guess neither would again try to reestablish being a practicing attorney.
His filing an application for the draft also was pointed out that there were inconsistencies with dates and signatures. What else is new?
Why did San Fran Nan certify Zero was eligible to hold the office of the presidency with the same certification used in 49 states, but different wording for the certificate in Hawaii? Somebody knows something.
This is probably the last article about the “insider” that I will read. He or she is obviously an arrogant ass that believes the Bush neocons are evil and all Democrats are little angels. At least he or she is half right. If the Dems are so great, why wasn’t the Bill Clinton era better for everyone? Rather, we may sincerely thank the Repubs control of the House and Senate during that time for the “good gridlock” that occurred & held back the full White House agenda.
What is wrong with a extension on tax cuts for the rich? Must we continue this class warfare fire that Dems always want to foment? That strategy is getting old and will potentially hurt our economy more for us dwindling middle class, and poor people.
Anyway, the tone of this person is smarmy and conceited and they are withholding info that supposedly will be released in the near future. Boring me.
FYI saw a woman on CNN this morning saying the dems are “going to trap the republicans on the tax debate. They will push it out a couple years and use it in 2012″ That sounds almost exatly what the insider said in this interview. Ding-dong another right call for the insider.
Well time to start digging through the Times..
http://query.nytimes.com/search/sitesearch?query=rezko&submit.x=0&submit.y=0&submit=sub
Hey Warren great job posting that link!! It is about time we start to really follow these crumbs this insider is telling us. That third story down in that NY TIMES link has some very interesting information about a bank tied to the democratic candidate tied to Obama and Rezko. Hmmm….
insider fan,
Hate to burst your happy box, but I heard a pundit say the same thing about the tax extensions on FOX News several days ago, don’t remember who exactly or which show.
I’d like to believe in Ulsterman’s Insider, but feel that there needs to be a prediction that blows my socks off. Everyone knows that Gibbs will go soon; that’s been all over the media. Also, not hard to guess that there may be scandals brewing. How about some kind of “insider” detail of the scandal without blowing cover that would lend credibility to this deep throat source?
I remain skeptical but intrigued until such time.
On the topic of potential Chicago-based scandals, it was mind-boggling in 2008 that the media didn’t investigate in more detail Obama’s home purchase that Rezko helped with. Obviously there was more to this than Obama’s lame explanations suggested, and the media just took his word and moved on:
http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=4315880&page=1
I began to read this “deep throat” with a considerable amount of interest but he wears thin. After this last report with his quotes, he comes across as just another democrat operative – maybe like an aged James Carville – who knows zip about economics and plays the economic class warfare card – regardless of the damage to the economy and the people democrats “proclaim” to want to help. Where would this guy have us believe the money comes from to provide tools for labor to work with, how are the choices made as to where to employ such? The discipline of realized profits and losses channels scarce resources into better job creating events than ANY politically driven choice in the use of these resources: political choices are made based on expected votes garnered, as we know, and not how much better it is calculated to make the lives of the voters. Democrats would have us believe that good politics is also good economics. The reverse it true.
Good interview. Interesting response from the person being interviewed. Having been in politics since the Nixon era, here’s my problem with the interviewee’s answer to the so-called “birther problem.” Simply, he down played it and did so “obviously”. Frankly, if the prez was born in the USA, that Birth Certificate would have been FRAMED and flying high.
Also, I can’t imagine a paper like the Times and the Post “holding on” to anything at this point. The president has an all time low-low popularity poll, there’s no incentive to hold onto a “scoop” that is supposedly of Watergate scale.
The answer regarding Clinton was also too sketchy and a bit benign. The interviewee either knows alot more than he’s letting on to, or, he’s suddenly got cold feet.
Even the public knows Gibbs has got to go and is on his way out, tell us something that we don’t know. Gibbs has been and continues to be dead weight for the white house.
This president is obviously being influenced by people who don’t have a clue what they are doing (like his wife and mother in law) and the country is suffering for it. Five star vacations and chefs at the ready while families are losing their homes and there are no jobs. It is the ‘let them eat cake’ attitude that will finish this presidency. Simply, this president is anything but academic, anything but erudite, he is plain and simple: DUMB and DANGEROUS.
How about the recent raids by the FBI in Chicago?
http://bigpeace.com/jhoft/2010/09/28/fbi-raids-home-of-obama-associate-radical-aaan-leader-in-terrorism-sweep/
Anybody who believes this article is a moron. Who wrote the article? “Ulsterman?” Who’s that? I tried to figure it out, can’t find any name with any credentials. If the writer of the article has no credibility, his stories have no credibility.
The whole thing reads like it was made up. It sounds like an ambitious young writer who wants to get into politics having a fantasy interview with an important White House insider. A real insider wouldn’t say things like “watch out, you’re playing a dangerous game.”
It’s made up. Move on. Find another conspiracy to salivate over.
What about the South Carolina teaser ?
Whether all this is a hoax, it sure seems that Limbaugh has been alluding to it strongly in his programs – as I read the transcripts of such – the past two or three days.
And then, that guy Madsen, or whatever his name is has referenced Ulsterman in support of the comments he has made on the same possibilities.
So I am inclined to ascribe some real substance to Ulsterman\’s reports even though I wouldn\’t trust his \”deep throat\” an inch.
What’s the scandal in Chicago? My guess is ShoreBank – the “community development” bank, which holds a $10 mil equity loan on retired “pastor” Jeremiah Wright’s home, which is owned by the Trinity Church of Christ. His home is worth only a million or so. But that’s really just a scrap of TP in the great sewer that is ShoreBank.
ShoreBank collapsed in Aug. – taken over by the FDIC – but not before Lloyd Blankfein of GoldmanSachs (which is up to its bankers’ eyeballs in corruption with this WH) begged for a bailout. Who else is involved with ShoreBank – the usual suspects: Van Jones, Valerie Jarrett, Illinois Rep. Jan Schakowsky, SEIU, Alex Giannoulias, Univ. of Chicago brain Austan Goolsbee (who replaced Cristina Romer on the WH Council of Economic Advisors), etc. And General Electric. Oh, and Obama of course. Oh, and let’s not forget Hillary. Yup – Hillary.
Remember the “investigation” of GoldmanSachs – how they settled, on only one charge – some unintentional mistake, and paid a paltry fine of $500 mil (that’s the profit they make in like a couple of weeks)? Do you really think that was a coincidence?
What does ShoreBank do – they provide domestic and foreign microfinancing, they finance “green” projects and “green” jobs, and they sell … CARBON CREDITS. Remember the Chicago Climate Exchange – which supposedly died an ignoble death just days ago – intent was to trade in carbon credits, making billionaires out of its founders. The market was supposed to grow to trillions of dollars a year. Yes, TRILLIONS. Well, follow the $$$ …
I guarantee you this will be one of the top targets for Issa in January.
And look at United Central Bank – who’s mixed up there – Blago, Rezko, and … Obama.
It’s all been hiding in plain sight. You just have to read the stories at Breitbart’s Big Gov site:
http://biggovernment.com/tag/shorebank/ Lots of articles by real journalists – and it’s a complicated stew of nasty corruption. Plus Charlie Gasparino of Fox Business just wrote a book on ShoreBank & GoldmanSachs – “Bought & Paid For”. Again, it’s in PLAIN SIGHT. No wonder Obama’s been looking pasty lately – he doesn’t have quite the turned up nose at the great unwashed as he usually does. I can hear the drumbeat now ….
Why haven’t some of you heard of any of this? Because the corrupt, lazy stenographers posing as “journalists” at the NYT & the Washington ComPost are terrified of having their Boy King exposed as the Emperor with No Clothes.
This country will soon be on the brink of chaos – rioting in the streets – look at London right now – and the pathetic sycophantic traitorous JournoListas at Politico & the alphabet networks are deliberately covering up this & other scandals.
And it wouldn’t surprise me at all if none of this came to light – that is, covered by the “mainstream” press. The Dems will threaten Obama & his Soros monkeys with exposure – Obama may resign, claiming some obscure illness, and Biden may then serve as a placeholder – or he may stay in office, and Hillary will be running things behind the scenes. Look for Hillaryites or ex-Bill staffers to replace the soon-departing Obama staff – that will indicate which way the wind is blowing. One way or the other, Hillary will waltz right in to the Oval Office. Or that’s the plan, anyway.
But Americans are fools if they think Hillary will save their asses from tyranny. Her undergrad thesis at Wellesley was on Alinsky – she met with him often – he even offered her a job out of college – but she went on to law school. She’s on video saying “I am a progressive” (google it, Insider), and I just saw her on video on Beck, praising the Puppet Master himself, George Soros. She’ll be quite emboldened by Obama’s half-baked socialist success story, so we’d have socialism lite. Regulate the Internet, have government-funded journalism, tax the hell out of the “rich”, have government agencies regulate absolutely every area of our lives. I’d rather have Bill Clinton w/ a steady parade of bimbos in & out of the Oval Office than Hillary – she is just plain mean & cold as ice. Bill, despite his many faults, actually kind of likes the American people.
You see, Hillary has dirty hands too. So they will all be motivated to keep this very, very quiet. Nothing to see here folks! Wow, look at those crazy kids in the streets, breaking windows! Hey, that’s MY CAR!
And the Dems, just like this WH Insider, who care much more about winning elections and saving “the party”, than actually serving with honor & integrity, will tell themselves that they made a “sacrifice” for the sake of the country.
Werbaz Neutron:
I had the same impression as you listening to Rush on Monday. I was taken aback actually. In his opening monologue he seemed to be alluding to what we are reading here and the Madsen article. He was referencing the Politico article (Obama Isolated Ahead of 2012) the whole time but I read that article and it isn’t the same as what is here. He was being very coy about it though. I almost think he knows something is coming and he wants to be on the record.
i think it was irresponsible, perhaps stupid, for the interviewer, not to ask questions regarding the status of pelosi, given that this was much hyped as ‘the news to watch’ in previous installments.
there is growing resentment of speaker pelosi, and specifically the plans for election to the minority leader role in the house. come on, now…
On the Bush Tax Cut- “President Barack Obama’s top adviser suggested to The Huffington Post late Wednesday that the administration is ready to accept an across-the-board, temporary continuation of steep Bush-era tax cuts, including those for the wealthiest taxpayers.
That appears to be the only way, said David Axelrod, that middle-class taxpayers can keep their tax cuts, given the legislative and political realities facing Obama in the aftermath of last week’s electoral defeat.”
On Hillary Clinton- I hope she runs I’m ready to support her again once more.
The “insider” is a party person, in this case the Democratic Party.
Would they actually reveal a scandal that would take down the whole Democratic Party?
No way (shaking head), not going to happen.
This “insdier” would only reveal something that hurts Obama, but can be insulated from the party as a whole.
Before the election this person was truly disturbed and worried… now, not so much.
I don’t know if the “insider” reads the comments section of this blog, but on the off-hand chance that they do.
I have two questions:
Is your loyalty to the Democratic Party or to the United States of America?
(Hopefully, the “insider” doesn’t equate loyalty to the party as the same as loyalty to the United States of America — they are not the same — one is higher than the other.)
If you are loyal to the United States of America, does that loyalty require you to reveal imformation that could help America throw off the shackles that the “cap stone” players are aiming to place on America?
The American People.
These “cap stone” players are willing to destroy America’s sovereignty. Their only interest is personal power and they will use any vehicle to get as much power as possible — some people, knowing these plans, delude themselves into thinking the “cap stone” players actually have the best interests of America at heart — so go along with these treasonous objectives.
But they are so very wrong — in the end many of these minions will be shackled themselves along with the rest of us.
It gives me the chills, but there are very powerful sharks circling America right now and they smell blood in the water.
Heaven help the United States of America and the United States Constitution — which all elected office holders are sworn to serve & protect.
Ulsterman is:
Old
A central figure in the Democratic party
Has access to and is trusted by Obama
Is not inside the White House but has friends who are
Has worked for Obama
Has used dirty tricks when necessary therefore an adept politician who has been doing this for a long time
Has connections to Chicago politics
Is well respected by interviewer
Ulsterman is: Jesse Jackson
http://www.congress.org/congressorg/bio/userletter/?letter_id=6066018031&content_dir=congressorg
KA BOOM!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Ok… the link is an interesting article. But is the letter from Wayne Madsen to ??? And who is the rep. pictured on the page? the insider? Fill me in!
ok…. the article by Wayne Madsen… He’s a little nuts that guy. He thinks Bush was responsible for 9/11. As exciting and plausible as the info in the letter to do and so is… it’s a little far out for me.
Is it really that hard to see that the insider is fake, this ‘interview’ is fake, and Ulsterman is just a big fake?
I’m guessing you all also love getting psychic readings?
Come on people. Eyes open.
Is it really that hard to see that the insider is fake, this “interview” is fake, and Ulsterman is just a big fake?
I’m guessing you all also love getting psychic readings?
Come on people. Eyes open.
This insider has nailed it over and over again. Not long ago all the medai was talking about republicans fighting each other. This insider said no, its the democrats who are fighting. Now the media is telling that story. Insider said democrats are tired of pelosi. now media saying the same thing. insider said white house going to offer Hillary the VP spot. Then it happened. Insider said mass staff were leaving. Media wasnt saying that. Then it happened. Insider even called specific staff out who were leaving. Then it happend. Insider said from start the high ranking democrats disgusted by Obama and how he didn’t know what he was doing. Now media reporting on ThAT as well!!! This is the pattern that I see here people. These insider reports come out and then in a few days or weeks guess what?? THe media starts reporting on it. Almost every time this has happened. Either this is legit or this author is very very lucky. And now somethign is up on this scandal thing. Do some searching. There does seem to be somthing going on w/that. Insider says wait till republicans are able to launch investigations and then it really gets out there. Ok. I think the insider is right again. You doubters are still following Obama blindly. Open your eyes. THese reports are teh clues to what is gonna happen next. They have been right over and over again.
Chat –
Sohbet odaları –
Chat
Sohbet -
Sohbet –
Sohbet odaları
Sohbet -
Sex
Sohbet odaları
sohbet siteleri
Muhabbet
Sohbet Siteleri
Güzel Sözler -
Güvercin -
Radyo Dinle -
Sohbet Odası -
Güzel sözler -
Sohbetci -
Sohbet odaları -
SeX Hikayeleri
Mirc indir -
Dizi izle
Corey,
Stop pissing on our parade man! I think this is a credible source. However, if it isn’t and this is a complete hoax, I’m still enjoying it thoroughly. I have no life. Let me enjoy this Corey.
I don’t know who ‘Ulsterman’ is, but I doubt there’s actually an Insider talking to him/her. If you actually look at the ‘predictions’ you’ll see that they’re all vaguely worded, they’re things most people who pay attention to politics could guess, and if he misses one or two, if Gibbs doesn’t leave, or Hillary doesn’t run, or Pelosi remains in charge of the House dems, he’s left the reasons open. Carnival fortune-tellers use the same mixture of guesses/vague allusions by listening and paying attention to clues given by the mark. I’m sure that there are Plenty O’ Scandals… Miranda pointed out some of the things that could be the huge scandal Insider says is coming, two of which are Shorebank and the CCE. The thing is, many many scandals were known before Obama was elected (Rezco, Ayres, Wright, Alinsky etc.) and it didn’t make any difference then. A new scandal isn’t going to change anything now unless, of course, the MSM suddenly turns on him and starts reporting everything he’s had his fingers in… yeah, right.
Looks like the Obama people are in here trying to discredit this source. If you have read the whole series you know the time this insider something to effect that a big news story was coming soon about a “Hillary for VP” offer. Two days later that very thing was ALL OVER the news. That is when I finally said this thing is legit. These predictions have been right over and over again. Go suck eggs Obama lovers. A scandal is coming down on your heads soon and you know it. This president has been a terrible disaster for america. Just awful.
Whoa, Washington Post op ed this Sunday says Obama should decline to run for re-election.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/11/12/AR2010111202846.html
The birth certificate issue is a red herring. Where Obama was born does not need to be addressed because there are some obvious facts that makes him ineligible.
Obama is not a natural born citizen. that is a fact. Natural is defined as Obama being a us citizena dn bothe his parents being a us citizen. His dad was not. In order to be president you have to be natural born.
The problem is that nowhere in state statutes was there a requirement to verify eligibility so the democrats rammed this presidnet through without vetting him. The Congressional Reserach Service a research arm of the Congress just confimred all this. The 9 th Circuit Court of appeals has also agreed.
The problem was that up until the change of power in Congress judges were afraid of taking on the question for fear of being harassed by the executive branch.
That Obama is ineligble is fact. That the Congress will do anything is doubtful. That future presidents will be properly vetted via state stautes is very probable.
All of Obama’s personal documents are all under seal is very, very suspicious. There is information that would prove very embarrassing to him and probably to the country.
I agree. I believe that he was not a citizen by birth which is the Constitutional requirement. You don’t have to be born on US territory although that makes the determination easier, but both your parents have to be US citizens. I am convinced that we have an unnaturalized, uneligible person serving as President.
In any case, his refusal to authorize the full publication of the Hawaiian BC is very troubling. IF he was born in HI, he could prove it very quickly and the matter would be closed. There’s something very very troubling here. He has people alude to it, but he will not authorize its release.
That he registered as a non-citizen at that college in California is a glaring problem that the media just ignores.
The “Insider” says, “Boehner is not all that bright”, and that the Republican public will AGAIN be fooled by the “tax the rich” BS. Boehner is certainly brighter than this IDIOT who thinks that Americans will “forget” what they did and vote Democrat in 2012. No way! The Democrat overreach went too far, and the public is coming after them BIG TIME. The tea party will finish off the Dems in 2012, and will likely start taking over their party as well. The days of a “blind public” is over; we’re looking squarely at you. And when the public finds out who YOU are, Mr. Insider, we’ll insure your “CAREER” on public funds is over as well.
To gilgil: As much as it would be great if it were true, I’m afraid this issue is a dead horse. The U.S. Constitution doesn’t actually define what a “natural born citizen” is. Therefore, Title 8 of the U.S. Code fills in the gaps. Section 1401 defines who would be considered a citizen “of the United States at birth”. Among the obvious (any one born in the United States, as long as they are under its jurisdiction) there are two that would seem to define Obama, whether he was born in the U.S. or Kenya: •Any one born in a U.S. possession, if one parent is a citizen and lived in the U.S. for at least one year. And •Any one born outside the United States, if one parent is an alien and as long as the other parent is a citizen of the U.S. who lived in the U.S. for at least five years. Nowhere does it say that it requires both parents to be U.S. citizens.
It’s looking increasingly like “Insider” was wrong about Pelosi not having enough support to stay on as leader.
A very good political forecast and opinion. Thanks for sharing.
Hillary is just biding her time until her moles destroy Obama. the Clintons are laughing their heads off behind closed doors. They have not forgotten O stole the election from her.
And she is one evil demon. She is not better than O. They are both destructive evil. Hillary’s hero is Saul Alinsky and she hung out with him at Wellsley College, where some of the Communist hang out. She is evil personified, and this country can not withstand another Clinton Regime.
All of this scum needs to be in jail, not in the highest offices in the land.
The key is now Femi Nazi Marxist Pelosi because she will not leave without exposing Obama, and Hillary will use Pelosi’s vengeance against our illegal communist muslim usurping fraud Obama to bring him down, and unseat him in disgrace. This is the good part, the bad part is this nation can not withstand Hitler Hillary for 4 years, so we will have to be vigilant to see that she and her minions do not succeed.
But Pelosi knows what is in all of the sealed Records, & will let Hillary’s moles destroy Obama. If Pelosi does it she will be impeached for seating this illegal alien fraud!!
America is a country of intrigues. How could a rational person doubt the birth place of Obama? It is this kind of evilmindedness displayed by most Americans against the so called minorities that automatically deprives them global leadership role. Was Obama born in Africa? How many Americans can claim to be natives of that vast INDIAN territory?
Kere.namoso. It’s good to see you and I admire you for your work you are doing.
Regardless of whether or not we are “native” as you say (I myself am 1/16 Indian), the Constitution written over 250 years ago makes provisions that a person be a citizen in order to be elected President. No other qualifications regarding race or religion, etc. exists. That means that anyone of any nationalitiy can be elected as President as long as he is a citizen and at least one of his parents were at at he time of his birth: “No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty-five years, and been fourteen years a resident within the United States.”
I forgot to add that this is the reason that the former Governor of California (until just a few days ago), Arnold Schwarzenegger could be a Governor, but never a President. He tried his best to get this changed so that he could run for Prez, but was never successful. The point that many on this fourm are making is that Obama has sealed his records to the extent that it difficult to prove that he actually fits the criteria to have been elected. He’s the only president that has sealed their past records, which is the first thing he did after being elected. One has to ask oneself………what was the purpose for that action, and why so fast?
He’s created these problems for himself by his actions, despite vowing to have a “transparent” presidency. This man is the most secretive president that I’ve known in my 69 years.
He’s earned the scrutiny that he’s under especially since his presidency is essentially one failed project after another, even according to the opinions of people not of this nation. South Korea just flat turned him down when he tried to firm up the agreement that President Bush had initiated with S. Korea. All the guy had to do was to get the signatures, more or less. They refused to tie themselves to our economy after seeing the mess he’s created of it.
Forgive me. I had it wrong. There are a few more criteria concerning the parents:
Anyone born inside the United States
Any Indian or Eskimo born in the United States, provided being a citizen of the U.S. does not impair the person\\\’s status as a citizen of the tribe
Any one born outside the United States, both of whose parents are citizens of the U.S., as long as one parent has lived in the U.S.
Any one born outside the United States, if one parent is a citizen and lived in the U.S. for at least one year and the other parent is a U.S. national
Any one born in a U.S. possession, if one parent is a citizen and lived in the U.S. for at least one year
Any one found in the U.S. under the age of five, whose parentage cannot be determined, as long as proof of non-citizenship is not provided by age 21
Any one born outside the United States, if one parent is an alien and as long as the other parent is a citizen of the U.S. who lived in the U.S. for at least five years (with military and diplomatic service included in this time)
A final, historical condition: a person born before 5/24/1934 of an alien father and a U.S. citizen mother who has lived in the U.S.
Anna: Obama didn’t seal his records.
http://blogcritics.org/politics/article/the-executive-order-13489-fallacy/
Think before talking. Research things. Don’t believe what you’re told. You’re buying into conspiracy theories that aren’t true. Wake up.
@Demosthenes 7.
I did do research. In effect, what this order does is over-turn the previous executive order by Bush, that Presidential records can be made publicly available through the Freedom of Information Act.
Executive Order link: http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2009/pdf/E9-1712.pdf
And, IF this new Executive Order pertains only to the records he creates as President, where are all those records that are missing from his past?
Occidental College records, Columbia College records, Columbia Thesis paper. Harvard College records, his medical records, kindergarten records (to disprove allegations about his citizenship………..you know? ) Harvard Law Review articles published — None
University of Chicago scholarly articles — None. Record of baptism– Not released or ‘not available’ [ or non-existent?]
Illinois State Senate records–’not available’
And, yes, the certified embossed copy of his birth certificate, and not the computer generated one he released.
Where are all these records? He’s the President! Where is the records of his past?
We have a right to know who/what was elected.
Anna: Where are Sarah Palin’s records?
Obama hasn’t hidden anything. He just hasn’t publicly released some of his records. He doesn’t have articles of the Harvard Law Review because he was the editor of the Harvard Law Review. He graduated Magna Com Laude, meaning he had a gpa of over 3.5.
So is Sarah Palin hiding her past? Apparently, by your logic, she is. And you claim to have done the research, but you still said that Obama sealed all of his records, which is untrue. So you’re just saying things that aren’t true for fun?
Well, I posted a response and it was posted. ??
I’ll try again.
Flawed logic is on your part.
Sarah Palin isn’t running for President, nor is she the sitting president. And, neither has my next door neighbor released any of his records for public viewing. Nice red herring, though.
All past President released their records after being elected. Bush, however, released his prior to his election so people could see who/what he was. How completely different from the man in WH who pledged for a “transparent” administration. ROFLMAO!
Obama hasn’t “hidden” anything? He just hasn’t publicly released some of his records? LOL! What’s the difference? Tell me……. which records has he released?
Obama wasn’t the editor of the Harvard Law Review, he was the PRESIDENT. It would have been singularly unique for Obama to have been picked as the President of the Harvard Law Review without ever having written or even edited any scholarly articles. Law students elected to the prestigious Harvard Law Review spend two years working there, writing brief, anonymous case comments in their first year. Even Susan Estrich, a classmate, was skeptical about his not having written anything.“They probably don’t want [to] have you [reporters] going back” to examine the Review, University of Southern California law professor (and Michael Dukakis campaign manager)
Ohhhhhh…….wait a moment. In 2008 Politico found a paper written by Obama concerning abortion back in 1990, although he’d, with the usual lack of truthfulness he’d never mentioned this article, and his campaign even said he’d just “edited” articles. However, after Poltico discovered this article, they were forced to admit he did write it : TORT LAW – PRENATAL INJURIES – SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS REFUSES TO RECOGNIZE CAUSE OF ACTION BROUGHT BY FETUS AGAINST ITS MOTHER FOR UNINTENTIONAL INFLICTION OF PRENATAL INJURIES.
Why all this lying (by omission) by the sitting president and his group? As far as his graduating Magna Cum Laude, how do you know? No records have been released? Just because he said so?
The part about his “sealing” his records, I’ve already addressed in the comment I made about his Executive Order to not allow his records to be released using the Freedom of Information Act.
So, you’re just saying things that aren’t true for fun?
Here’s the link about the article that forced Obama to admit he did write something after trying to hide the fact that he did.
http://sweetness-light.com/archive/when-abortion-wasnt-above-his-paygrade
Since there is no record of Mr. Obama’s writings apart from this just uncovered unattributed and seemingly lackluster piece, how. Obama attain the position as President of the Harvard Law Review?
The answer is in the article.
It’s already known that Dear Leader traveled to Pakistan in 1980 when it was illegal to do so with a U.S. passport. So which nation’s passport did he use? That says right there he hasn’t always been a U.S. citizen. It doesn’t matter whether he was born in Hawaii or not.
This is rich:
Pelosi will be the Party leader in the House starting in 2011.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/michaeltomasky/2010/nov/18/congress-nancy-pelosi-still-leader
I guess our Deep Throat has his work cut out for him.
Let me see if I get it: Obama hates Pelosi. Pelosi hates Obama. HC hates Obama. Obama hates HC. So where do HC and Pelosi stand?
I dunno. But it looks like a food fight to me.
Hate to tell you this, old sport, but Clinton herself *laughed* when asked if she was running in either 2012 or 2016, and then said she wasn’t. Repeatedly. What more do you PUMAs want? She’s not running for President, and all the whinging in the world won’t change that.
*rolls eyes*
What’s next, an attempt to draft Geraldine Ferraro as her running mate?
And oh, Gary? You’re 100% wrong about the passport. There’s even a little article from the TRAVEL section of the New York Times back in 1981 giving tips for tourists. Why are you still promulgating lies that were debunked years ago?
I sure hope you people don’t procreate.
(I’ve tried repeatedly to post this today and keep being told “there is a problem on this forum.” Will try it this way with no links to see if it gets posted.
What Presidential candidate DID NOT initially deny they were interested in the Presidency?
Obama laughed at running for President himself, more than once. So, it is not proof of anything that Hill is being coy about running. Who has not at first denied and then began to run for President?
Denying you are not going to run, and then eventually running for President is just part of the game.
Look at both examples of Bloomberg AND Obama
So, yea, I think Hill will run when she sees an opportunity, and I think that opportunity is fast approaching.
Anna – I’m very sorry that Hillary Clinton lost in the primaries in 2008. She seems very happy as Secretary of State, and has *repeatedly* said that she is not running for President in either 2012 or 2016. Why are you so ready to believe she’s lying?
As for your absurd contention that lying about running for President means that someone *is* running, and that Hillary Clinton is therefore lying when she denies the rumors PUMAs keep dredging up from the litterbox, I’ll apologize the day I see Secretary Clinton neglecting her official duties to tramp through the snow in Iowa or visit a diner in New Hampshire. Otherwise, I’ll take her at her word.
Barry Soetoro would have had no problem getting in and out of Pakistan in 1981 with an Indonesian passport.
Oops!
GOP subpeona power, baby!
@ellid. Thank you for putting words into my mouth. Nowhere did I mention the word “lying”. That’s how subjects get ramped up into feces throwing contests. I said it’s part of the game.
If your memory is so poor as to not remember this going on in past elections…………this site would not let me post the links where this has happened over and over, there’s nothing I can say that will change your mind. Doesn’t really amount to a hill of beans to me whether or not you take my word for it.
Just remember this discussion in the future when she does run.
Sorry, old sport, but Hillary Clinton has repeatedly said that she is not running for President in 2012 or 2016. The last time she did so she laughed. If your insistence that she is running despite this is anything BUT a direct assertion that she is lying, then what is it?
And oh – Bobby Jindal just said today that he’s not running for President. Is he lying, too? Or is Hillary Clinton the only politician in Washington whose actual, direct words can be ignored by her adoring fans?
She lost the nomination in 2008. She’s said repeatedly that she’s not running for President in 2012 or 2016. What about that are you unable to understand? And why do you believe the anonymous words of a blogger over the clear statement of the woman herself?
If you and your fellow PUMAs are so obsessed with electing a female President, go look for someone younger WHO ACTUALLY WANTS THE JOB. Otherwise, go find another hobby, like volunteering at the local homeless shelter. You’ve had two whole years to get over Hillary Clinton losing the Democratic nomination. She’s gotten over it. Why won’t you?
And oh, Anna? Take a gander at this story on CNN.com. Still think this so-called “insider” is right and Hillary Clinton is running for President? Or are you once again implying that she’s lying?
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2010/11/21/clinton-im-not-running-for-president/#more-136486
Give it a rest, ellid.
Go someplace else for your food fight. There are some that are here to discuss/read the article/discussions, not get into inane side arguments such as your trying to stir up.
You’ve lost anyway.