White House Insider: Ulsterman Reports are Fiction
Published by seiva7 on February 16, 2011 in World Politics-
30
Liked it 
Subscribe to RSS
Discover shocking truth about the Ulsterman’s White House Insider.
Image by cliff1066™ via Flickr
While making long informative articles on politics and staying on the top of the hot content list on Triond all the time is not a bad way to shape the public mind it is painfully obvious.
But one thing is to write good articles and state your own opinion on a subject and the other is to create and promote imaginary persona’s, “informants”.
It is sure a good way to get some attention for your writing…
Even I was wondering is there a White House insider out there or no.
And after short thinking I came to the conclusion that there may be some guy from the White House who will share sensitive information.
But at the same time I believed that that kind of insider could not possibly be giving away his information for a guy Ulsterman to publish it on Triond.
After some digging and few days of phone calls I discovered that there is no White House insider who would be feeding info to the journalists.
In other words: Ulsterman reports are fiction.
I was told that these famous White House insider story is out there only to discredit Obama and his policies.
This make perfect sense to me as I didn’t read any Ulsterman’s article that says something good about Obama.
Everybody can understand why would somebody write about politics; but why would somebody write about only specific very small area of politics (in this case Obama and his family, White House) if he/she don’t have special interest in that.?
Ulsterman’s articles are clearly coloured in only one set of colours and nobody should trust entirely not only his articles but any article out there that presents only one side of the complicated story.
I know people like when somebody make complicated things look simple but do not let them fool you.
Open your own eyes, wake up.
Seiva7, weren’t you the one who posted the article about Justin Beiber being dead this week? How credible are you?
This “piece”, such as it is, is utterly laughable. The syntax isn’t even written in proper English. It reads as though it’s a phonetic English masking a spoken foreign language. Moreover, I’m wondering what “calls” were made, and to whom? She doesn’t say. This “article” is no more than a garden variety blog post posing as a journalistic investigation. It’s tripe.
oh, ulsterman already registered as 2 other users and is here to discredit me.
guys, the question is not how credible I am but rather how credible Ulsterman is?
and about my english not being perfect; I wonder how well you can write in any foreign language smart guy nick!?
Seiva: You made a declarative statement that Ulsterman’s White House Insider reports are fiction. Therefore you deserve to come under scrutiny for making such a claim. And if you can’t take even the mild “heat” of something like this then get out of the “kitchen” of making these absurd claims. Based on the tripe you’ve written here, the essence of your conclusion is that this is fiction because: the articles aren’t sympathetic enough to Obama. This is an editorial on your part, not a news piece. your opinion has no bearing on the veracity of his articles. And like all arguments made by liberals, yours here pathetically weak. In fact I’m wondering if you even have a clue about the nature of the White House Insider pieces.
His source did a de-facto self identification on one of his interviews with Ulsterman. The source, a Democrat, spoke of the fund raiser during the campaign he attended with a donor to meet Michelle Obama. By doing so he “put himself in the room”. They al know who he is now, and even that has failed to stop the flow of his info to Ulsterman, much to the chagrin of pinhead liberals.
Most ironic of your reply to the posts was that you seem to think your own credibility isn’t the issue. True, but your make such a weak, specious and spurious argument to substantiate your claims we have to conclude your credibility IS nothing more than a typically pathetic liberal defense. But the irony is this: attacking personal credibility is EXACTLY what the left does, ESPECIALLY in the face of the exposure of their corruption. Case in point: The Third Lantern is now a newly formed non profit group with one sole purpose: attack the personal credibility of Darrell Issa, new chairman of the House Oversight Committee because he’s planning on conducting Oversight. Which means only 1 thing: the uber-corrupt Obama administration (no doubt funneling money to The Third Lantern) has PLENTY to hide. Hopefully (and I’m confident they will) someone will do a Follow The Money investigation on The Third Lantern, out of fairness, after all. Isn’t that what got your panties in a wad about the Ulsterman articles to begin with – “fairness” and “balance”?
There will always be a leak somewhere as far as government or corporate affairs are concerned. The veracity of Ulsterman’s “revelations” are still under scrutiny until proven true.
Seiva7, when you make posts about Justin Bieber, make comments to poems about teenagers and have your boobs hanging out on your profile pic, we have to ask ourselves if you’re even old enough to vote or intelligent enough to know what the hell you’re talking about.
And where is the proof of YOUR accusations? Your opinion is not factual. Ulsterman’s credibility is far more believable than yours. The Washington Insider not only is real, but has proved to be true on many occasions.
I think you Sieva7 and Ulsterman are Mnofdichotomy and I think all these responses on here are your own.
Sieva:
You appear to be a teen ager with a poor command of the language. You state as proof that ulsterman is merely making things up to hurt Obama by the fact that all of his inside reports put Obama in a bad light. Think this out sister…..all of the reports have come TRUE. Every one of them….he predicted Rahm leaving, Gibbs leaving, the “O” novel. His reports on Obama still smoking is true. We have all heard reports from WH staffers, including Gibbs reporting that Obama has still been smoking which is contrary to Michelles statements.
Sieva, I would suggest you use LOGIC to debate his credibility, not some high school gibberish that frankly makes you appear to be rather vapid and without alot of smarts. Good luck with your “writing” career. lol
Sieva states :
I would like to ask you, what good had “YOUR” side did for the country whiles they were ruling?
(Except war?)
———————————————–
Are you kidding me? I can’t even comment on this. You really have a command for the language don’t you. And your ability to logically debate is stunning….lol
Your article gives credibility to Ulsterman, you do realize this , no?
PS; Many of Obamas biggests critics are on “his side”, he has been a huge FAIL for the democrats… Many are idenpendant/libertarians (me). So, I don’t know what you are “trying” to say
I can only send “All of YOU” to one of my articles because it seems that I was right about this one…
Ulsterman, you are posting comment by yourself, I don’t believe this!
http://socyberty.com/politics/ulstermans-negative-comments-posted-by-members-without-picture-and-profile/
good share
Do you know how many people were discrediting the leaks from Deep Throat during the Watergate era? Well well well. Turns out that Deep Throat was a real person who was really leaking information from inside the White House. So it\’s totally possible that someone inside this screwed up White House is disgusted by what they see and are leaking to high heaven.
At last someone is making the observation that Ulsterman articles are not inside information, they are not comment, they are not news. They are anti-Obama spin, disinformation, and bigotry disguised in an attempt to add credibility.
As for attacking someone writing in a second language over grammar, well that’s no more than you’d expect from Ulsterman’s desperate army.
Obama will be re-elected. Chew on that.
of course,,,,,,,,,,,the race card. LOL !
tired, old and boring.
Obama and his minions are out in 12. So, he best get the carpets cleaned and give the house a good scrubbing to get the smoke smell out of the drapes…..cause he’s a one term prez…maybe not even that. Impeachment is likely.
of course,,,,,,,,,,,the race card. LOL !
tired, old and boring.
Obama and his minions are out in 12. So, he best get the carpets cleaned and give the house a good scrubbing to get the smoke smell out of the drapes…..cause he\’s a one term prez…maybe not even that. Impeachment is likely.
It’s clear seiva87 is in search of her 15 Minutes Of Fame, so she figures the way to get it is by attacking what is undoubtedly THE most widely read series of articles this site has ever known. Nothing she writes on her own would ever generate that much interest, i.e., attention. Even her attempt to escape the culpability of meaning what she said by the lame conflation of “I didn’t say The White House Insider didn’t exist, I sad he wasn’t passing Ulsterman information”. Which, for the sake of her ridiculous point here, is the same. And again, her basis for claiming the White House Insider articles are fiction is that they aren’t sympathetic enough to Obama. She posits a factual claim based on a subjective emotion – her own. It’s tantamount to her saying this: “The White House Insider articles are fiction because – I just don’t believe them”, as if that were the end of the argument. Seiva87’s clearly in over her head, intellectually speaking.
Nick, I am not saying that Ulsterman articles are not “the most widely read series of articles this site has ever known”.
I am just saying that most of it is pure BS.
One sided point of view can never be the truth and that is the FACT.
That is all I’m trying to say.
I questioned Ulsterman’s reporting – not following up with his own writing. Another email is not a follow up. I was kicked off his facebook page. I commented on Newsflavor about it, following up his report. He removed it. I asked legitimate questions about why no investigation of his own and waiting for his readers to send him links is not follow up. I was censored. Hmmm who does that sound like…don’t like the view someone has so shut them out. Very Obama-ish. And very childish. This will probably disappear also.
Nick, how about this guy (or a girl) saying this about Ulsterman?
What do you think about this?
What is this? A war going on? I’m female. Seiva7 you said he presented a one sided view and from my experience he intends to keep it that way. I don’t like Obama, but how can I argue any of this with no evidence? Right now he’s posting gossip. The potential was there to bring about a deep, informational discussion. That’s been shot down. After what he did with my questions, I don’t believe anything he posts. He’s going to have to prove it whether he likes it or not.
He goes through Obama’s bins but they are pretend bins and conjured up after the sad old fart (U*******n) has had a few too many.
Beverly I wrote an article about your comment.
I hope you don’t mind.
It is still pending but will be published soon I hope so.
@seiva7 you said:
“One sided point of view can never be the truth and that is the FACT.”
How do you get that a “one sided point of view” cannot be FACT? It sure as hell can be FACT. True every story has two sides, but a lot of what goes around about this goon in the white house is not OPINION, IT IS FACT. You can believe it or not, who cares.
YOU (on the left) are the ones who need to open your minds and see what damage this man is doing to this country, by design. And the lemmings in Washington and the rest of the country who follow this chicago thug and believe everything he says will some day be proven to be as stupid as they obviously are.
sheila my dear friend, I still don’t understand why you guys are calling me “liberal”, “on the left” and other names…?
is there any reason for that?
what is next?
You will call me marxist leninist?
SheilaK,
Yes, opinion can be fact. If you are presenting something as opinion, and want people to believe it as fact, you\’d better be able to prove it.
When I was in college the ACLU came to talk. These two women lawyers came in dressed in jeans and sat on the edge of the stage swinging their legs. They were representing a girl who had stabbed to death an elderly woman, trying to save her from the death penalty. Every time I asked a question, they stammered and said they could send the info to me. Why were they there if they couldn\’t give us info to support our arguments? They came in thinking it was going to be a love fest and we would be in awe of them for being from the ACLU. I came away thinking what idiots they were.
If you\’re going to convince people of anything, you have to have facts to blend with your opinion. Ulsterman is making a mistake by banning free discussion. Knowing all sides and points of view can strengthens your argument. Shutting people out, you narrow your argument and your audience. Just look at some of the ratings of the networks who refuse to present opposing views, or question your reporting. If they do have opposing views on, they go to personal, vile attacks and lies.
An open mind doesn\’t mean you have to change your views.
Bev
I cannot agree more on this one Beverly.
All I was trying to say is not to believe one sided stories from any source and written for any reason.
Not that I am attacking Ulsterman personally…
I am attacking stupidity of the one sided propaganda.
IT is propaganda and it doesn’t lead to anything good.
But see, suddenly Ulsterman’s crew is silent.
I wonder why…
seiva7
Girl, you need to work on your grammer. I had to read each sentence three or four times to understand the meaning. Are you passing English 101 this semester? I suspect that is not the case. Maybe you should look into summer school. As for attacking
Ulsterman’s credibility; don’t you have anything better to do than hang out on a political websites exchanging comments with people you don’t know. Maybe a boyfriend would take up some of your spare time. In regards to your “article” I have a couple of comments. First, you state…
“But at the same time I believed that that kind of insider could not possibly be giving away his information for a guy Ulsterman to publish it on Triond.”
So your opinion is only a certain “kind” of insider is able to pass information. I’m curious. What “kind” of insider to you believe him to be that disqualifies him from being credible? Is it because he only has negative things to say about Obama? From my experience insiders usually are those that are disillusioned and feel it’s their moral responsibility to speak to the people in order to avert an abuse of power. Apparently you see it differently. Apparently you believe that because the insider is negative towards Obama; and because Ulsterman’s website is obviously negative toward Obama; that they must both be one and the same. Am I correct? Second, you state…
“After some digging and few days of phone calls I discovered that there is no White House insider who would be feeding info to the journalists.”
Again, I’m curious. What sort of “digging” and what “phone calls” did you make to reveal this truth? Allow me to venture a guess. At the breakfast table you had a political disscussion with mom and dad concerning your suspicions of Ulsterman motives. Mom said; “do you believe everything you read? Those people will say anything to discredit Obama and his policies. That’s their job!” Dad said; “why do you waste your time on those websites? You need to be studying English! I’m tired of seeing F’s on your report card! And why don’t you have a boyfriend like all the other girls? Your not living in my house for the rest of your life!” Satisfied, you then called your girlfriends Lisa, Mary, and Amy and had a teleconference using your new iPhone app. They said; “seiva7, why are you confusing us with all this complicated Ulsterman stuff? He’s just a meanie! He doesn’t like Obama so he’s making stuff up. He only speaks to simpletons. By the way, there’s a boy in my science class who likes you. You should go on facebook and friend him instead of Ulsterman. It would be a better use of your time”.
Thus, convinced the information given you by reliable sources is true, you procceed to your computer to compose your “article”; leaving us with the statement…
“In other words: Ulsterman reports are fiction.”
I, for one, am impressed. I’ve never seen such a well researched “article”. You certainly have me convinced.
Now, on a serious note, I actually am an informed person and I have read Ulsterman’s “insider” pieces. There are things the insider had said that have come to pass; which makes me believe he he does exist. So, for future reference, when you write an “article” please refrain from insulting your readers intelligence by stating…
“I know people like when somebody make complicated things look simple but do not let them fool you.
Open your own eyes, wake up.”
The only simpleton I see is you and for you to inform me about propaganda is laughable. Stick to the teen magazines. If not, inform yourself before speaking to educated adults with real world experience.
seiva7
Girl, you need to work on your grammer. I had to read each sentence three or four times to understand the meaning. Are you passing English 101 this semester? I suspect that is not the case. Maybe you should look into summer school. As for attacking
Ulsterman’s credibility; don\’t you have anything better to do than hang out on a political websites exchanging comments with people you don\’t know. Maybe a boyfriend would take up some of your spare time. In regards to your \”article\” I have a couple of comments. First, you state…
\”But at the same time I believed that that kind of insider could not possibly be giving away his information for a guy Ulsterman to publish it on Triond.\”
So your opinion is only a certain \”kind\” of insider is able to pass information. I\’m curious. What \”kind\” of insider to you believe him to be that disqualifies him from being credible? Is it because he only has negative things to say about Obama? From my experience insiders usually are those that are disillusioned and feel it\’s their moral responsibility to speak to the people in order to avert an abuse of power. Apparently you see it differently. Apparently you believe that because the insider is negative towards Obama; and because Ulsterman\’s website is obviously negative toward Obama; that they must both be one and the same. Am I correct? Second, you state…
\”After some digging and few days of phone calls I discovered that there is no White House insider who would be feeding info to the journalists.\”
Again, I\’m curious. What sort of \”digging\” and what \”phone calls\” did you make to reveal this truth? Allow me to venture a guess. At the breakfast table you had a political disscussion with mom and dad concerning your suspicions of Ulsterman motives. Mom said; \”do you believe everything you read? Those people will say anything to discredit Obama and his policies. That\’s their job!\” Dad said; \”why do you waste your time on those websites? You need to be studying English! I\’m tired of seeing F\’s on your report card! And why don\’t you have a boyfriend like all the other girls? Your not living in my house for the rest of your life!\” Satisfied, you then called your girlfriends Lisa, Mary, and Amy and had a teleconference using your new iPhone app. They said; \”seiva7, why are you confusing us with all this complicated Ulsterman stuff? He\’s just a meanie! He doesn\’t like Obama so he\’s making stuff up. He only speaks to simpletons. By the way, there\’s a boy in my science class who likes you. You should go on facebook and friend him instead of Ulsterman. It would be a better use of your time\”.
Thus, convinced the information given you by reliable sources is true, you procceed to your computer to compose your \”article\”; leaving us with the statement…
\”In other words: Ulsterman reports are fiction.\”
I, for one, am impressed. I\’ve never seen such a well researched \”article\”. You certainly have me convinced.
Now, on a serious note, I actually am an informed person and I have read Ulsterman’s \”insider\” pieces. There are things the insider had said that have come to pass; which makes me believe he he does exist. So, for future reference, when you write an \”article\” please refrain from insulting your readers intelligence by stating…
\”I know people like when somebody make complicated things look simple but do not let them fool you.
Open your own eyes, wake up.\”
The only simpleton I see is you and for you to inform me about propaganda is laughable. Stick to the teen magazines. If not, inform yourself before speaking to educated adults with real world experience.
seiva7
Girl, you need to work on your grammer. I had to read each sentence three or four times to understand the meaning. Are you passing English 101 this semester? I suspect that is not the case. Maybe you should look into summer school. As for attacking
Ulsterman’s credibility; don’t you have anything better to do than hang out on a political website exchanging comments with people you don’t know. Maybe a boyfriend would take up some of your spare time. In regards to your “article” I have a couple of comments. First, you state…
“But at the same time I believed that that kind of insider could not possibly be giving away his information for a guy Ulsterman to publish it on Triond.”
So your opinion is only a certain “kind” of insider is able to pass information. I’m curious. What “kind” of insider do you believe him to be that disqualifies him from being credible? Is it because he only has negative things to say about Obama? From my experience insiders usually are those that are disillusioned and feel it’s their moral responsibility to speak to the people in order to avert an abuse of power. Apparently you see it differently. Apparently you believe that because the insider is negative towards Obama; and because Ulsterman’s website is obviously negative toward Obama; that they must both be one and the same. Am I correct? Second, you state…
“After some digging and few days of phone calls I discovered that there is no White House insider who would be feeding info to the journalists.”
Again, I’m curious. What sort of “digging” and what “phone calls” did you make to reveal this truth? Allow me to venture a guess. At the breakfast table you had a political disscussion with mom and dad concerning your suspicions of Ulsterman motives. Mom said; “do you believe everything you read? Those people will say anything to discredit Obama and his policies. That’s their job!” Dad said; “why do you waste your time on those websites? You need to be studying English! I’m tired of seeing F’s on your report card! And why don’t you have a boyfriend like all the other girls? Your not living in my house for the rest of your life!” Satisfied, you then called your girlfriends Lisa, Mary, and Amy and had a teleconference using your new iPhone app. They said; “seiva7, why are you confusing us with all this complicated Ulsterman stuff? He’s just a meanie! He doesn’t like Obama so he’s making stuff up. He only speaks to simpletons. By the way, there’s a boy in my science class who likes you. You should go on facebook and friend him instead of Ulsterman. It would be a better use of your time”.
Thus, convinced the information given you by reliable sources is true, you procceed to your computer to compose your “article”; leaving us with the statement…
“In other words: Ulsterman reports are fiction.”
I, for one, am impressed. I’ve never seen such a well researched “article”. You certainly have me convinced.
Now, on a serious note, I actually am an informed person and I have read Ulsterman’s “insider” pieces. There are things the insider had said that have come to pass; which makes me believe he he does exist. So, for future reference, when you write an “article” please refrain from insulting your readers intelligence by stating…
“I know people like when somebody make complicated things look simple but do not let them fool you. Open your own eyes, wake up.”
The only simpleton I see is you and for you to inform me about propaganda is laughable. Stick to the teen magazines. If not, inform yourself before speaking to educated adults with real world experience.
seiva7
Girl, you need to work on your grammer. I had to read each sentence three or four times to understand the meaning. Are you passing English 101 this semester? I suspect that is not the case. Maybe you should look into summer school. As for attacking
Ulsterman’s credibility; don\\\’t you have anything better to do than hang out on a political website exchanging comments with people you don\\\’t know. Maybe a boyfriend would take up some of your spare time. In regards to your \\\”article\\\” I have a couple of comments. First, you state…
\\\”But at the same time I believed that that kind of insider could not possibly be giving away his information for a guy Ulsterman to publish it on Triond.\\\”
So your opinion is only a certain \\\”kind\\\” of insider is able to pass information. I\\\’m curious. What \\\”kind\\\” of insider do you believe him to be that disqualifies him from being credible? Is it because he only has negative things to say about Obama? From my experience insiders usually are those that are disillusioned and feel it\\\’s their moral responsibility to speak to the people in order to avert an abuse of power. Apparently you see it differently. Apparently you believe that because the insider is negative towards Obama; and because Ulsterman\\\’s website is obviously negative toward Obama; that they must both be one and the same. Am I correct? Second, you state…
\\\”After some digging and few days of phone calls I discovered that there is no White House insider who would be feeding info to the journalists.\\\”
Again, I\\\’m curious. What sort of \\\”digging\\\” and what \\\”phone calls\\\” did you make to reveal this truth? Allow me to venture a guess. At the breakfast table you had a political disscussion with mom and dad concerning your suspicions of Ulsterman motives. Mom said; \\\”do you believe everything you read? Those people will say anything to discredit Obama and his policies. That\\\’s their job!\\\” Dad said; \\\”why do you waste your time on those websites? You need to be studying English! I\\\’m tired of seeing F\\\’s on your report card! And why don\\\’t you have a boyfriend like all the other girls? Your not living in my house for the rest of your life!\\\” Satisfied, you then called your girlfriends Lisa, Mary, and Amy and had a teleconference using your new iPhone app. They said; \\\”seiva7, why are you confusing us with all this complicated Ulsterman stuff? He\\\’s just a meanie! He doesn\\\’t like Obama so he\\\’s making stuff up. He only speaks to simpletons. By the way, there\\\’s a boy in my science class who likes you. You should go on facebook and friend him instead of Ulsterman. It would be a better use of your time\\\”.
Thus, convinced the information given you by reliable sources is true, you procceed to your computer to compose your \\\”article\\\”; leaving us with the statement…
\\\”In other words: Ulsterman reports are fiction.\\\”
I, for one, am impressed. I\\\’ve never seen such a well researched \\\”article\\\”. You certainly have me convinced.
Now, on a serious note, I actually am an informed person and I have read Ulsterman’s \\\”insider\\\” pieces. There are things the insider had said that have come to pass; which makes me believe he he does exist. So, for future reference, when you write an \\\”article\\\” please refrain from insulting your readers intelligence by stating…
\\\”I know people like when somebody make complicated things look simple but do not let them fool you. Open your own eyes, wake up.\\\”
The only simpleton I see is you and for you to inform me about propaganda is laughable. Stick to the teen magazines. If not, inform yourself before speaking to educated adults with real world experience.
seiva7, you need to work on your grammer. I had to read each sentence three or four times to understand the meaning. Are you passing English 101 this semester? I suspect that is not the case. Maybe you should look into summer school. As for attacking
Ulsterman’s credibility; don’t you have anything better to do than hang out on a political website exchanging comments with people you don’t know. Maybe a boyfriend would take up some of your spare time. In regards to your “article” I have a couple of comments. First, you state…
“But at the same time I believed that that kind of insider could not possibly be giving away his information for a guy Ulsterman to publish it on Triond.”
So your opinion is only a certain “kind” of insider is able to pass information. I’m curious. What “kind” of insider do you believe him to be that disqualifies him from being credible? Is it because he only has negative things to say about Obama? From my experience insiders usually are those that are disillusioned and feel it’s their moral responsibility to speak to the people in order to avert an abuse of power. Apparently you see it differently. Apparently you believe that because the insider is negative towards Obama; and because Ulsterman’s website is obviously negative toward Obama; that they must both be one and the same. Am I correct? Second, you state…
“After some digging and few days of phone calls I discovered that there is no White House insider who would be feeding info to the journalists.”
Again, I’m curious. What sort of “digging” and what “phone calls” did you make to reveal this truth? Allow me to venture a guess. At the breakfast table you had a political disscussion with mom and dad concerning your suspicions of Ulsterman motives. Mom said; “do you believe everything you read? Those people will say anything to discredit Obama and his policies. That’s their job!” Dad said; “why do you waste your time on those websites? You need to be studying English! I’m tired of seeing F’s on your report card! And why don’t you have a boyfriend like all the other girls? Your not living in my house for the rest of your life!” Satisfied, you then called your girlfriends Lisa, Mary, and Amy and had a teleconference using your new iPhone app. They said; “seiva7, why are you confusing us with all this complicated Ulsterman stuff? He’s just a meanie! He doesn’t like Obama so he’s making stuff up. He only speaks to simpletons. By the way, there’s a boy in my science class who likes you. You should go on facebook and friend him instead of Ulsterman. It would be a better use of your time”.
Thus, convinced the information given you by reliable sources is true, you procceed to your computer to compose your “article”; leaving us with the statement…
“In other words: Ulsterman reports are fiction.”
I, for one, am impressed. I’ve never seen such a well researched “article”. You certainly have me convinced.
Now, on a serious note, I actually am an informed person and I have read Ulsterman’s “insider” pieces. There are things the insider had said that have come to pass; which makes me believe he he does exist. So, for future reference, when you write an “article” please refrain from insulting your readers intelligence by stating…
“I know people like when somebody make complicated things look simple but do not let them fool you. Open your own eyes, wake up.”
The only simpleton I see is you and for you to inform me about propaganda is laughable. Stick to the teen magazines. If not, inform yourself before speaking to educated adults with real world experience.
By the way, no, I’m not Ulsterman. I’m actually the insider, which makes me Ulsterman to you…lol.
seiva7, you need to work on your grammer. I had to read each sentence three or four times to understand the meaning. Are you passing English 101 this semester? I suspect that is not the case. Maybe you should look into summer school. As for attacking
Ulsterman’s credibility; don\’t you have anything better to do than hang out on a political website exchanging comments with people you don\’t know. Maybe a boyfriend would take up some of your spare time. In regards to your ‘article’ I have a couple of comments. First, you state…
But at the same time I believed that that kind of insider could not possibly be giving away his information for a guy Ulsterman to publish it on Triond.
So your opinion is only a certain kind of insider is able to pass information. I\’m curious. What \”kind\” of insider do you believe him to be that disqualifies him from being credible? Is it because he only has negative things to say about Obama? From my experience insiders usually are those that are disillusioned and feel it\’s their moral responsibility to speak to the people in order to avert an abuse of power. Apparently you see it differently. Apparently you believe that because the insider is negative towards Obama; and because Ulsterman\’s website is obviously negative toward Obama; that they must both be one and the same. Am I correct? Second, you state…
\”After some digging and few days of phone calls I discovered that there is no White House insider who would be feeding info to the journalists.\”
Again, I\’m curious. What sort of \”digging\” and what \”phone calls\” did you make to reveal this truth? Allow me to venture a guess. At the breakfast table you had a political disscussion with mom and dad concerning your suspicions of Ulsterman motives. Mom said; \”do you believe everything you read? Those people will say anything to discredit Obama and his policies. That\’s their job!\” Dad said; \”why do you waste your time on those websites? You need to be studying English! I\’m tired of seeing F\’s on your report card! And why don\’t you have a boyfriend like all the other girls? Your not living in my house for the rest of your life!\” Satisfied, you then called your girlfriends Lisa, Mary, and Amy and had a teleconference using your new iPhone app. They said; \”seiva7, why are you confusing us with all this complicated Ulsterman stuff? He\’s just a meanie! He doesn\’t like Obama so he\’s making stuff up. He only speaks to simpletons. By the way, there\’s a boy in my science class who likes you. You should go on facebook and friend him instead of Ulsterman. It would be a better use of your time\”.
Thus, convinced the information given you by reliable sources is true, you procceed to your computer to compose your \”article\”; leaving us with the statement…
\”In other words: Ulsterman reports are fiction.\”
I, for one, am impressed. I\’ve never seen such a well researched \”article\”. You certainly have me convinced.
Now, on a serious note, I actually am an informed person and I have read Ulsterman’s \”insider\” pieces. There are things the insider had said that have come to pass; which makes me believe he he does exist. So, for future reference, when you write an \”article\” please refrain from insulting your readers intelligence by stating…
\”I know people like when somebody make complicated things look simple but do not let them fool you. Open your own eyes, wake up.\”
The only simpleton I see is you and for you to inform me about propaganda is laughable. Stick to the teen magazines. If not, inform yourself before speaking to educated adults with real world experience.
By the way, no, I\’m not Ulsterman. I\’m actually the insider, which makes me Ulsterman to you…lol.
seiva7, you need to work on your grammer. I had to read each sentence three or four times to understand the meaning. Are you passing English 101 this semester? I suspect that is not the case. Maybe you should look into summer school. As for attacking
Ulsterman’s credibility; dont you have anything better to do than hang out on a political website exchanging comments with people you dont know. Maybe a boyfriend would take up some of your spare time. In regards to your article I have a couple of comments. First, you state…
But at the same time I believed that that kind of insider could not possibly be giving away his information for a guy Ulsterman to publish it on Triond.
So your opinion is only a certain kind of insider is able to pass information. Im curious. What kind of insider do you believe him to be that disqualifies him from being credible? Is it because he only has negative things to say about Obama? From my experience insiders usually are those that are disillusioned and feel its their moral responsibility to speak to the people in order to avert an abuse of power. Apparently you see it differently. Apparently you believe that because the insider is negative towards Obama; and because Ulstermans website is obviously negative toward Obama; that they must both be one and the same. Am I correct? Second, you state…
After some digging and few days of phone calls I discovered that there is no White House insider who would be feeding info to the journalists.
Again, Im curious. What sort of digging and what sort of phone calls did you make to reveal this truth? Allow me to venture a guess. At the breakfast table you had a political disscussion with mom and dad concerning your suspicions of Ulsterman motives. Mom said; do you believe everything you read? Those people will say anything to discredit Obama and his policies. Thats their job! Dad said; why do you waste your time on those websites? You need to be studying English! Im tired of seeing Fs on your report card! And why dont you have a boyfriend like all the other girls? Your not living in my house for the rest of your life!
Satisfied, you then called your girlfriends Lisa, Mary, and Amy and had a teleconference using your new iPhone app. They said; seiva7, why are you confusing us with all this complicated Ulsterman stuff? Hes just a meanie! He doesnt like Obama so hes making stuff up. He only speaks to simpletons. By the way, theres a boy in my science class who likes you. You should go on facebook and friend him instead of Ulsterman. It would be a better use of your time.
Thus, convinced the information given you by reliable sources is true, you procceed to your computer to compose your article; leaving us with the statement…
In other words: Ulsterman reports are fiction.
I, for one, am impressed. Ive never seen such a well researched article. You certainly have me convinced.
Now, on a serious note, I actually am an informed person and I have read Ulsterman’s insider pieces. There are items the insider stated that have come to pass; which makes me believe he he does exist. So, for future reference, when you write another article please refrain from insulting your readers intelligence by stating…
I know people like when somebody make complicated things look simple but do not let them fool you. Open your own eyes, wake up.
The only simpleton I see is you and for you to inform me about propaganda is laughable. Stick to the teen magazines. If not, inform yourself before speaking to educated adults with real world experience.
By the way, no, Im not Ulsterman. Im actually the insider, which makes me Ulsterman to you…lol.
Seiva7 has said what many people are thinking and you lot – with so much time on your hand it is sad – are either very deluded or (as suggested all over the internet) Ulsterman.
The same people (or Ulsterman) who have criticised the way she looks voted for Bristol Palin and adore her mother so much they use a box of Kleenex a week thinking of her…
Go and do one WASPs…
check this guy, he posted one comment a million times.
again, attacking me based on my AGE and SEX…
like you can say how old I am or how educated I am from one picture.
but I must admit, I am all of that, and more;
I am socialist.
And i adore Obama…
(oh I think I will puke)
I dislike Ulsterman’s style of writing. I also defend it. Someday, s/he will piss someone off whom with come after the author for damages… Reporting a ‘fake celebrity death’ can cause an actor to be passed-over (no pun intended) for a choice acting role, -and this is grounds for legal suite.
-I am really hoping someone does a ‘fake news’ article about Bill Cosby because he has declared that the next time some hack writer creates a fake news article about him (fake obituary, etc.) he intends to sue for libel. Unlike Bette White and Abe Vigoda whom have also been reported dead several times over the years (Abe even has a website that is updated daily proclaiming his still alive status…), and they seem to enjoy or at least, endure the abuse, Bill was quoted a year or so ago that he has had enough of it and intended to fight back legally next time.
Has anyone else noticed the way that seiva7 phrases the comments and the spelling of the word color. My spidey sense tells me that:
1. The writer is not American.
2. The when describing her \”phone calls and a little digging\” the indications are that she/he is consulting with academia. Her conclusions reached are merely wishful thinking based on what someone \”smarter than her\” has led her to believe.
This based on her writing;
\”I was told that these famous White House insider story is out there only to discredit Obama and his policies.
This make perfect sense to me as I didn’t read any Ulsterman’s article that says something good about Obama.\”
Typical Alinky tactic to discredit and marginalize which is so often used by the \”elite\” academia to refute any logical or reasoned argument.
Just saying it isn\’t so much what she says as it is how she says it that leads me to these conclusions.
How a progressive troll attacks those that do not kneel and kiss King’s ring 101.
A 5 step process. Most likely distributed in crayon with lots of pictures.
1. Make sure you show him or her attacking the family – in this case Obama and his family
2. Infer the race card – Ulsterman’s articles are clearly coloured in only one set of colours.
3. Claim fiction with fiction. – After some digging and few days of phone calls I discovered that there is no White House insider who would be feeding info to the journalists.
4. Attack intelligence. – I know people like when somebody make complicated things look simple.
5. Feign indifference – Open your own eyes, wake up.
Yawn, obviously cheap and easy.
I think it should be obvious to all trolls over here that I am Marxist Leninist socialistic scam planted by the power elite who want to dismantle the USA.
The end is near.
well you may not be a marxist-leninist plant or whatever.
but seiva7, you are an idiot. And not because of your politics.
but because you have no command the English language. Also, for someone trying to debunk a series of articles quoting an anonymous source, you are very light on sourcing yourself. I mean, you cite unspecified phone calls as part of your case that WHI is made up. C\’mon! Who did you call? Who did you consult? Are you too young to remember Deep Throat and Watergate?
Ulsterman may well be blowing smoke. but at least the smoke he\’s been blowing has some ring of truth. WHI predicted Gibbs, predicted Emanuel. He got the Pelosi thing wrong, but no-one is 100%. POTUS is still smoking.
You need to finish high school, and read a book on English grammar before you seek to debate those more intellectually mature than yourself.
Mr. Doc, I didn’t know that better command of language and grammar make one “more intellectually mature”?
@seiva7 not the end, the resurgence!. However you maybe more phoney than originally thought.????
Persona Management Software.
Solicitation Number: RTB220610
Agency: Department of the Air Force
Office: Air Mobility Command
Location: 6th Contracting Squadron
Solicitation Number:
RTB220610 Notice Type:
Sources Sought Synopsis:
Added: Jun 22, 2010 1:42 pm Modified: Jun 22, 2010 2:07 pmTrack Changes
0001- Online Persona Management Service. 50 User Licenses, 10 Personas per user.
Software will allow 10 personas per user, replete with background , history, supporting details, and cyber presences that are technically, culturally and geographacilly consistent. Individual applications will enable an operator to exercise a number of different online persons from the same workstation and without fear of being discovered by sophisticated adversaries. Personas must be able to appear to originate in nearly any part of the world and can interact through conventional online services and social media platforms. The service includes a user friendly application environment to maximize the user\\\’s situational awareness by displaying real-time local information.
0002- Secure Virtual Private Network (VPN). 1 each
VPN provides the ability for users to daily and automatically obtain randomly selected
IP addresses through which they can access the internet. The daily rotation of
the user s IP address prevents compromise during observation of likely or
targeted web sites or services, while hiding the existence of the operation. In
addition, may provide traffic mixing, blending the user s traffic with traffic from
multitudes of users from outside the organization. This traffic blending provides
excellent cover and powerful deniability. Anonymizer Enterprise Chameleon or equal
0003- Static IP Address Management. 50 each
Licence protects the identity of government agencies and enterprise
organizations. Enables organizations to manage their persistent online personas
by assigning static IP addresses to each persona. Individuals can perform
static impersonations, which allow them to look like the same person over time.
Also allows organizations that frequent same site/service often to easily switch IP
addresses to look like ordinary users as opposed to one organization. Anonymizer IP Mapper License or equal
0004- Virtual Private Servers, CONUS. 1 each
Provides CONUS or OCONUS points of presence locations that are setup for
each customer based on the geographic area of operations the customer is
operating within and which allow a customer?s online persona(s) to appear to
originate from. Ability to provide virtual private servers that are procured using
commercial hosting centers around the world and which are established
anonymously. Once procured, the geosite is incorporated into the network and
integrated within the customers environment and ready for use by the customer.
Unless specifically designated as shared, locations are dedicated for use by
each customer and never shared among other customers. Anonymizer Annual Dedicated CONUS Light Geosite or equal
0005- Virtual Private Servers, OCONUS. 8 Each
Provides CONUS or OCONUS points of presence locations that are setup for
each customer based on the geographic area of operations the customer is
operating within and which allow a customer?s online persona(s) to appear to
originate from. Ability to provide virtual private servers that are procured using
commercial hosting centers around the world and which are established
anonymously. Once procured, the geosite is incorporated into the network and
integrated within the customers environment and ready for use by the customer.
Unless specifically designated as shared, locations are dedicated for use by
each customer and never shared among other customers. Anonymizer Annual Dedicated OCONUS Light Geosite or equal
0006- Remote Access Secure Virtual Private Network. 1 each
Secure Operating Environment provides a reliable and protected computing
environment from which to stage and conduct operations. Every session uses a
clean Virtual Machine (VM) image. The solution is accessed through sets of
Virtual Private Network (VPN) devices located at each Customer facility. The
fully-managed VDI (Virtual Desktop Infrastructure) is an environment that allows
users remote access from their desktop into a VM. Upon session termination,
the VM is deleted and any virus, worm, or malicious software that the user inadvertently downloaded is destroyed. Anonymizer Virtual Desktop Infrastructure (VDI) Solution or equal.
Contracting Office Address:
2606 Brown Pelican Ave.
MacDill AFB, Florida 33621-5000
United States
Place of Performance:
Performance will be at MacDIll AFB, Kabul, Afghanistan and Baghdad, Iraq.
MacDill AFB , Florida 33679
United States
Primary Point of Contact.:
Russell Beasley,
Contracting Officer
russell.beasley-02@macdill.af.mil
Phone: (813) 828-4729
Fax: (813) 828-5111
@seiva7 not the end, the resurgence!. However you maybe more phoney than originally thought.????
Persona Management Software.
Solicitation Number: RTB220610
Agency: Department of the Air Force
Office: Air Mobility Command
Location: 6th Contracting Squadron
Solicitation Number:
RTB220610 Notice Type:
Sources Sought Synopsis:
Added: Jun 22, 2010 1:42 pm Modified: Jun 22, 2010 2:07 pmTrack Changes
0001- Online Persona Management Service. 50 User Licenses, 10 Personas per user.
Software will allow 10 personas per user, replete with background , history, supporting details, and cyber presences that are technically, culturally and geographacilly consistent. Individual applications will enable an operator to exercise a number of different online persons from the same workstation and without fear of being discovered by sophisticated adversaries. Personas must be able to appear to originate in nearly any part of the world and can interact through conventional online services and social media platforms. The service includes a user friendly application environment to maximize the user\\\\\\\’s situational awareness by displaying real-time local information.
0002- Secure Virtual Private Network (VPN). 1 each
VPN provides the ability for users to daily and automatically obtain randomly selected
IP addresses through which they can access the internet. The daily rotation of
the user s IP address prevents compromise during observation of likely or
targeted web sites or services, while hiding the existence of the operation. In
addition, may provide traffic mixing, blending the user s traffic with traffic from
multitudes of users from outside the organization. This traffic blending provides
excellent cover and powerful deniability. Anonymizer Enterprise Chameleon or equal
0003- Static IP Address Management. 50 each
Licence protects the identity of government agencies and enterprise
organizations. Enables organizations to manage their persistent online personas
by assigning static IP addresses to each persona. Individuals can perform
static impersonations, which allow them to look like the same person over time.
Also allows organizations that frequent same site/service often to easily switch IP
addresses to look like ordinary users as opposed to one organization. Anonymizer IP Mapper License or equal
0004- Virtual Private Servers, CONUS. 1 each
Provides CONUS or OCONUS points of presence locations that are setup for
each customer based on the geographic area of operations the customer is
operating within and which allow a customer?s online persona(s) to appear to
originate from. Ability to provide virtual private servers that are procured using
commercial hosting centers around the world and which are established
anonymously. Once procured, the geosite is incorporated into the network and
integrated within the customers environment and ready for use by the customer.
Unless specifically designated as shared, locations are dedicated for use by
each customer and never shared among other customers. Anonymizer Annual Dedicated CONUS Light Geosite or equal
0005- Virtual Private Servers, OCONUS. 8 Each
Provides CONUS or OCONUS points of presence locations that are setup for
each customer based on the geographic area of operations the customer is
operating within and which allow a customer?s online persona(s) to appear to
originate from. Ability to provide virtual private servers that are procured using
commercial hosting centers around the world and which are established
anonymously. Once procured, the geosite is incorporated into the network and
integrated within the customers environment and ready for use by the customer.
Unless specifically designated as shared, locations are dedicated for use by
each customer and never shared among other customers. Anonymizer Annual Dedicated OCONUS Light Geosite or equal
0006- Remote Access Secure Virtual Private Network. 1 each
Secure Operating Environment provides a reliable and protected computing
environment from which to stage and conduct operations. Every session uses a
clean Virtual Machine (VM) image. The solution is accessed through sets of
Virtual Private Network (VPN) devices located at each Customer facility. The
fully-managed VDI (Virtual Desktop Infrastructure) is an environment that allows
users remote access from their desktop into a VM. Upon session termination,
the VM is deleted and any virus, worm, or malicious software that the user inadvertently downloaded is destroyed. Anonymizer Virtual Desktop Infrastructure (VDI) Solution or equal.
Contracting Office Address:
2606 Brown Pelican Ave.
MacDill AFB, Florida 33621-5000
United States
Place of Performance:
Performance will be at MacDIll AFB, Kabul, Afghanistan and Baghdad, Iraq.
MacDill AFB , Florida 33679
United States
Primary Point of Contact.:
Russell Beasley,
Contracting Officer
russell.beasley-02@macdill.af.mil
Phone: (813) 828-4729
Fax: (813) 828-5111
Justavet, I am not, you are welcome to read my other articles to find it out for yourself.
Would that be the same type of proof as the White House Insider?
I don’t know, I am not trying to convince anybody, I am just asking all the people to question every news and every report…
Seiva7, don’t you think you should be asking the main street press to question Obama and his policies, instead of following him around like lap dogs? As for your comments, where is your proof??? Remember seiva7, question every news and every report…… you’re brilliant
main street press is doing their job of supporting the establishment, what I don’t understand is how can Ulsterman be taken seriously when it is clear that he is also SUPPORTING the establishment…
AAAArrgggg!!!! You have just written a defining statement of your complete non-understanding of the CONSTITUTION and what I and millions of others swore to support and defend.
The Lame stream media is in our SUPREME law of the land to report to the highest office of the land “Citizen” when our supposed servants of the public stray or openly (as is the case from both Rebloodlicans and Democrips over the last 40 years) disregard it.
Dammit I did not spend 24 years on active duty, get shot and have some asshole in IRAQ try to shove a truck up my ass via an explosion to read this from what should be this. AMERICA’s “NOW” GREATEST GENERATION. It;s on us all but the 20s to 40s gotta step up even if you do not wear a uniform. Remember
“If ye love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude greater than the animating contest for freedom, go home from us in peace. We seek not your counsel, nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you; and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.” — Samuel Adams
I will post no longer on this subject.
Who were you fighting for in Iraq?
Your country?
Or corporate interests?
Well done Seiva7, you have really upset the pond life with this series. Will you please pass on to Ulsterman, just to keep him foaming at the mouth, the news that before too long there won’t be an Ulster, just the island of Ireland
You are clearly a liberal shill with an agenda … to discredit Ulsterman because his reports tell the truth about Obama.
There was a whole army of Obamaites doing the dirty work during his campaign. Big difference now is that we’re on to you.
mr walter, I wrote an article about Ulsterman’s fans calling me liberall and “Obamaites” which is completely untrue.
LIKE THE ARTICLE
thank you for your comment.
Seems to me, about half (or more) of those posts against you were written by the same person. They all had the same syntax and tone. I think you’re right in criticizing Ulsterman. Something definitely reeks there.
liberal agitator, I had written article about this, you can check it over here:
http://socyberty.com/politics/ulstermans-negative-comments-posted-by-members-without-picture-and-profile/
I was told that these famous White House insider story is out there only to discredit Obama and his policies.
This make perfect sense to me as I didn’t read any Ulsterman’s article that says something good about Obama.
Everybody can understand why would somebody write about politics; but why would somebody write about only specific very small area of politics (in this case Obama and his family, White House) if he/she don’t have special interest in that.?
Read more: http://newsflavor.com/politics/world-politics/white-house-insider-ulsterman-reports-are-fiction/#ixzz1IPV6YBoO