Article Tools

Man jailed even though two separate paternity tests proved he is not the father.

Imagine being in a court room and hearing the judge sentence you to jail for something that you have had no involvement in. As you look around the court room you realize you are actually going to jail and you are innocent. It is happening to men every day in America.

Image via Wikipedia

How many men are in jail unjustly because of support enforcement? Frank Hatley is just one of many.

In 2002 DNA samples proved that  Frank Hatley,  age 50, is not the father of  Essie Lee Morrison’s son who was born in 1987. Morrison told Hatley the child was his. The two never married and had only a very short term relationship. Ms. Morrison named him as the father when she applied for DSHS benefits. Two separate DNA tests in the last nine years confirmed he was not the father of the boy, who is now 21.

After 2001 hearing, Superior Court Judge Dan Perkins relieved Mr. Hatley of any future child support obligation but ordered him to pay back owed support. When Mr. Hatley lost his job in June of 2008, and could not make the payments, the state of Georgia decided to disregard the fact that he was not the father and had him thrown is jail for failure to pay child support.

After The Southern Center For Human Rights took on Mr. Hatleys case, Judge Perkins issued a Court order for his release from jail On Wednesday July15 2009, and an order freeing him from financial obligation to the Georgia Department of Human Resources.

Mr Hatley is not satisfied with this. He feels that he needs justice since he was defrauded out of thousands of dollars and over one year of his life by  the State of Georgia and Essie Lee Morrison.

This fraudulent activity by the Child Support Enforcement Agencies and by many women is not uncommon.

30% of paternal DNA tests prove that the named father is in fact not the biological father. If a man cannot afford to get Dna testing done, It is assumed that he is admitting to be the father as far as support enforcement is concerned. This is an outrage and needs to be dealt with as such. It is unlawful imprisonment when the state wrongfully imprisons someone they know is innocent  It is fraud when they extort money by threatening these men with jail if they don’t pay for children who are not theirs.  The women who perpetrate the fraud in the first place should go to jail. If they do not know who the daddy is, they should just say so instead of committing fraud by naming whoever they think may or may not be the father.The whole support enforcement system is corrupt when they are extorting money with the threat of false imprisonment. Someone needs to be held accountable.